Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27222237›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2017

Perceived barriers to partner notification among sexually transmitted infection clinic patients, Cape Town, South Africa.

Seth C Kalichman, Catherine Mathews, Moira Kalichman, Mark N Lurie, Sarah Dewing

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seth C KalichmanUniversity of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Catherine MathewsSouth African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Moira KalichmanUniversity of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Mark N LurieBrown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Sarah DewingSouth African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

Enhanced STI/HIV Partner Notification in South AfricaR01HD074560 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI KALICHMAN, SETH C · 2013 to 2017
$2.8M
Partnerships for the Next Generation of HIV Social Science in South AfricaR24HD077976 · NICHD · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI COLVIN, CHRISTOPHER JAMES, LURIE, MARK NATHAN · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD074560NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD077976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Public health approaches to sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention in resource-limited countries rely on patients to self-notify sex partners of their STI. However, a majority of partners go uninformed and remain untreated and infectious. Methods: Anonymous surveys collected from 776 men and women receiving STI clinic services in Cape Town, South Africa. Results: Half of patients surveyed intended to inform their partners, while half did not intend to notify partners. Women were more likely than men to intend to notify their partners. Patients who completed formal education were also more likely to indicate intentions to notify partners. There were no associations between numbers of partners patients had or partner types with intentions to notify partners. Among both men and women, concerns about adverse partner reactions were associated with intentions not to notify partners. Multivariable analyses stratified by gender and controlling for confounds showed that intentions to notify partners were significantly related to men's concerns that their partner could react violently against them and women's concerns that their partner may leave them and refuse to see them again. Conclusions: Interventions that assist patients to develop strategies to safely inform their partners are needed to increase patient-initiated partner notification.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overContact TracingDisclosureFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsSexual BehaviorSexually Transmitted DiseasesSexual PartnersSouth AfricaYoung Adulthealth promotionpsychological determinantssexual behavior

Identifiers

PMID27222237
PMCPMC6075470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.