Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27222222›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2016

Characterising the microbiome of Corallina officinalis, a dominant calcified intertidal red alga.

Juliet Brodie, Christopher Williamson, Gary L Barker, Rachel H Walker, Andrew Briscoe, Marian Yallop

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The core fungal microbiome of banana (Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Defining and quantifying the core microbiome: Challenges and prospects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Juliet BrodieDepartment of Life Sciences, Genomics and Microbial Biodiversity, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7, 5BD, UK j.brodie@nhm.ac.uk.
Christopher WilliamsonDepartment of Life Sciences, Genomics and Microbial Biodiversity, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7, 5BD, UK.
Gary L BarkerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.
Rachel H WalkerDepartment of Life Sciences, Genomics and Microbial Biodiversity, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7, 5BD, UK.
Andrew BriscoeDepartment of Life Sciences, Genomics and Microbial Biodiversity, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7, 5BD, UK.
Marian YallopSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.
Genomics (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBNatural History Museum · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT097835MFWellcome Trust WT101650MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The living prokaryotic microbiome of the calcified geniculate (articulated) red alga, Corallina officinalis from the intertidal seashore is characterised for the first time based on the V6 hypervariable region of 16S rRNA. Results revealed an extraordinary diversity of bacteria associated with the microbiome. Thirty-five prokaryotic phyla were recovered, of which Proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Planctomycetes, Acidobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Firmicutes and Chloroflexi made up the core microbiome. Unclassified sequences made up 25% of sequences, suggesting insufficient sampling of the world's oceans/macroalgae. The greatest diversity in the microbiome was on the upper shore, followed by the lower shore then the middle shore, although the microbiome community composition did not vary between shore levels. The C. officinalis core microbiome was broadly similar in composition to those reported in the literature for crustose coralline algae (CCAs) and free-living rhodoliths. Differences in relative abundance of the phyla between the different types of calcified macroalgal species may relate to the intertidal versus subtidal habit of the taxa and functionality of the microbiome components. The results indicate that much work is needed to identify prokaryotic taxa, and to determine the nature of the relationship of the bacteria with the calcified host spatially, temporally and functionally.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaActinobacteriaBacteriaBacteroidetesChloroflexiCyanobacteriaProteobacteriaRhodophytaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SActinobacteriaBacteroidetesCorallina officinalisCyanobacteriaprokaryotesProteobacteria

Identifiers

PMID27222222
PMCPMC5831014
OpenAlexW2397601088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.