ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2016
Factors associated with patient recall of individualized dietary recommendations for kidney stone prevention.
Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Adherence to medical management of kidney stones: A systematic review.Urolithiasis · 2026Pooled it
- Urinary Supersaturation in a Randomized Trial Among Individuals With Recurrent Nephrolithiasis Comparing Empiric vs Selective Preventive Therapy: The URINE Trial.The Journal of urology · 2026Trial
- Diet Adherence in Urolithiasis Patients: a Mini Review.Current urology reports · 2025Review
- What patients with kidney stones believe about their condition.Urolithiasis · 2024Article
- Patient compliance to dietary recommendations: tips and tricks to improve compliance rates.World journal of urology · 2023Article
- Article
- Medical therapy for nephrolithiasis: State of the art.Asian journal of urology · 2018Review
- New treatment paradigms for ADPKD: moving towards precision medicine.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesDietary approaches to preventing the recurrence of idiopathic calcium-containing kidney stones are effective. However, a lifelong commitment to prevention is challenging for many patients. Multiple patient factors likely account for compliance and adherence with dietary recommendations. We examined patients' recall and compliance with dietary recommendations provided during clinical evaluation. SUBJECTS/
methodsOf 275 patients who received dietary recommendations from a dietitian, 112 completed an investigator-designed survey querying their recollection of dietary recommendations. Patients' responses were compared with the recommendations actually provided as entered in patients' medical records.
resultsPatients (62% male, 56±13 years; 38% female, 52±14 years) were provided 3.4±1.1 recommendations (min-max, 1-6) and recalled 67% of recommendations. Highest recalls were for (i) lower meat/fish/poultry intake, (ii) higher fluid intake and (iii) lower sodium (⩾68% for all). Lowest recalls were for weight loss, using citrus juices and increasing fruits/vegetables (⩽61% for all). Forty-seven percent of patients given 1-3 recommendations recalled 100%, whereas only 23% of patients provided >3 recommendations did so (P=0.011). Even though 38% of patients reported some difficulty following dietary recommendations, nearly all (91%) said that they were willing to continue following them.
conclusionsHigher patient recall is associated with ⩽3 dietary recommendations. Patient recall of recommendations that were not actually provided ('false recall') may contribute to reduced recall and confusion about the most important dietary strategies to reduce their stone risk. Accordingly, providers should prioritize the most important dietary recommendations, reserving those less important for follow-up, and address any confusion patients have from information received prior to evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27222155What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.