Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27222017›Full record

ReviewHNO2016

[Tumors of the lacrimal drainage system].

C von Goscinski, K R Koch, C Cursiefen, L M Heindl

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Masquerade lacrimal duct stenosis: prevalence of lacrimal sac tumors].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C von GoscinskiZentrum für Augenheilkunde, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Straße 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland. corinna.von-goscinski@uk-koeln.de.
K R KochZentrum für Augenheilkunde, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Straße 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland.
C CursiefenZentrum für Augenheilkunde, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Straße 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland.
L M HeindlZentrum für Augenheilkunde, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Straße 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland.
University Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of tumors affecting the lacrimal drainage system is low, thus generating a risk of late diagnosis and treatment in clinical routine. However, these tumors can be potentially life-threatening, which emphasizes the relevance of early diagnosis and treatment.

objectiveThis review focuses on the symptoms, incidence, management, and prognosis of the different tumor entities affecting the lacrimal drainage system.

methodsThe study provides a PubMed-based literature review and presents own clinical results.

resultsAlongside detailed medical history taking and comprehensive clinical examination, precise inspection during external dacryocystography is important for diagnosis of tumors affecting the lacrimal drainage system. There is a wide spectrum of tumor entities located in the lacrimal drainage system. The tumors are classified into three groups: primary epithelial, primary nonepithelial, and inflammatory lesions. The most common primary epithelial tumors include papilloma, squamous cell carcinoma, and transitional cell carcinoma. The most common nonepithelial tumors include fibrous histiocytoma, malignant lymphoma, and malignant melanoma; while the most common inflammatory lesions comprise sarcoidosis, Wegener granulomatosis, and pyogenic granuloma. Treatment depends on the entity and stage of the tumor. In the case of malignancy, a multimodal and interdisciplinary approach is usually indicated.

conclusionDifferential diagnostic signs in favor of a malignancy include a long medical history, predisposing conditions in the patient's history, a mass above the medial canthal ligament, teleangiectasis above the mass, and serosanguinous secretion.

Indexed as

DacryocystitisDiagnosis, DifferentialEvidence-Based MedicineEye NeoplasmsHumansLacrimal Apparatus DiseasesLacrimal Duct ObstructionNasolacrimal DuctTreatment OutcomeDacryocystitisLacrimal apparatusLacrimal duct obstructionNeoplasiaStenosis

Identifiers

PMID27222017
OpenAlexW2407047547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.