ArticleHepatology international2016
End-stage liver disease patients with MELD >40 have higher waitlist mortality compared to Status 1A patients.
Article in Hepatology international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implications of Pleural Fluid Composition in Persistent Pleural Effusion following Orthotopic Liver Transplant.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Transplantation in the era of the Covid-19 pandemic: How should transplant patients and programs be handled?Reviews in medical virology · 2021Review
- Use of SARS-CoV-2-infected deceased organ donors: Should we always "just say no?"American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2020Article
- Patients With Acute on Chronic Liver Failure Grade 3 Have Greater 14-Day Waitlist Mortality Than Status-1a Patients.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2019Article
- Utilization of SARS-COV-2 positive donors and recipients for liver transplantation in the pandemic era - An evidence-based review.Journal of liver transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsStatus 1A patients are prioritized over end-stage liver disease (ESLD) for liver transplantation (LT). ESLD patients with high MELD may have higher waitlist mortality than Status 1A patients, and may require LT more urgently.
methodsUsing United Network for Organ Sharing registry data, we retrospectively evaluated LT waitlist mortality and probability of LT between adults in the United States with Status 1A or ESLD with MELD >30 listed for LT from 2003-2013. Overall waitlist mortality and probability of LT were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier and multivariate logistic regression models.
resultsFrom 2003-2013, 15,049 ESLD patients with MELD >30 and 3049 Status 1A patients were listed for LT. While overall 14-day waitlist survival decreased with increasing MELD score among ESLD patients (54.0 % for MELD 31-35; 37.1 % for MELD 36-40; 27.5 % for MELD >40), overall survival at 14 days was significantly lower among Status 1A (14.4 %). Compared to Status 1A, ESLD patients with MELD >40 had significantly higher 14-day waitlist mortality (OR 1.92; 95 % CI 1.56-2.36; p < 0.001), whereas ESLD patients with MELD 36-40 had a non-significant trend towards higher waitlist mortality (OR 1.16; 95 % CI 0.93-1.45; p = 0.181). No difference in probability of LT within 14 days was observed between ESLD with MELD >40 and Status 1A (p = 0.89). ESLD patients with MELD >40 had higher post-LT survival compared to Status 1A on multivariate regression modeling (HR 0.80; 95 % CI 0.66-0.96; p < 0.02).
conclusionAmong adults in the United States awaiting LT, ESLD patients with MELD >40 have significantly higher waitlist mortality, but similar probability of receiving LT compared to Status 1A patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27221700What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.