ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2016
Integrating Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Reproductive, Maternal and Child, and Tuberculosis Health Services Within National Health Systems.
Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Integrating HIV services and other health services: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Implementation and experiences of integrated prevention of mother-to-child transmission services in Tanzania, Malawi and South Africa: A mixed methods study.Global public health · 2021Article
- Integrating Oral PrEP Into Family Planning Services for Women in Sub-saharan Africa: Findings From a Multi-Country Landscape Analysis.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2021Article
- 'Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance'? Towards a framework for assessing the health systems impact of the expanded Global Gag Rule.BMJ global health · 2019Review
- Article
- Integrating tuberculosis and antimicrobial resistance control programmes.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2018Article
- Decentralising and integrating HIV services in community-based health systems: a qualitative study of perceptions at macro, meso and micro levels of the health system.BMJ global health · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) established 90-90-90 HIV treatment targets for 2020 including the following: 90 % of HIV-infected people know their HIV status, 90 % of HIV-infected people who know their status are on treatment, and 90 % of people on HIV treatment have a suppressed viral load. Integration of HIV and other programs into the national health system provides an important pathway to reach those targets. We examine the case for integrating HIV and other health services to ensure sustainability and improve health outcomes within national health systems. In this non-systematic review, we examined recent studies on integrating HIV, tuberculosis (TB), maternal-child health (MCH), and sexually transmitted infection (STI) programs. Existing evidence is limited about the effectiveness of integration of HIV and other services. Most studies found that service integration increased uptake of services, but evidence is mixed about the effect on health outcomes or quality of health services. More rigorous studies of different strategies to promote integration over a wider range of services and settings are needed. Research on how best to maximize benefits, including sustainability, of integrated services is necessary to help inform international and national policy. We recommend additional interventions to test how best to integrate HIV and MCH services, HIV and TB services, HIV testing and treatment, and STI testing and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.