Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27221566›Full record

ReviewTrends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM2016

Ovarian Physiology and GWAS: Biobanks, Biology, and Beyond.

Triin Laisk-Podar, Cecilia M Lindgren, Maire Peters, Juha S Tapanainen, Cornelis B Lambalk, Andres Salumets, Reedik Mägi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Complex genetics of female fertility.NPJ genomic medicine · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Triin Laisk-PodarWomen's Clinic, University of Tartu, Tartu 51014, Estonia; Competence Centre on Health Technologies, Tartu 50410, Estonia. Electronic address: triin.laisk-podar@ut.ee.
Cecilia M LindgrenWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK; Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK.
Maire PetersWomen's Clinic, University of Tartu, Tartu 51014, Estonia; Competence Centre on Health Technologies, Tartu 50410, Estonia.
Juha S TapanainenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki 00014, Finland; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Oulu, University of Oulu, Medical Research Center Oulu and PEDEGO Research Unit, Oulu 90029, Finland.
Cornelis B LambalkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam 1007 MB, Netherlands.
Andres SalumetsWomen's Clinic, University of Tartu, Tartu 51014, Estonia; Competence Centre on Health Technologies, Tartu 50410, Estonia; Institute of Bio- and Translational Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu 50411, Estonia.
Reedik MägiEstonian Genome Center, University of Tartu, Tartu 51010, Estonia.
Tartu University Hospital · EEAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLCompetence Centre on Health Technologies (Estonia) · EEHelsinki University Hospital · FIUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Tartu · EE

Funding

Wellcome Trust 204826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian function is central to female fertility, and several genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been carried out to elucidate the genetic background of traits and disorders that reflect and affect ovarian physiology. While GWAS have been successful in reporting numerous genetic associations and highlighting involved pathways relevant to reproductive aging, for ovarian disorders, such as premature ovarian insufficiency and polycystic ovary syndrome, research has lagged behind due to insufficient study sample size. Novel approaches to study design and analysis methods that help to fit GWAS findings into biological context will improve our knowledge about genetics governing ovarian function in fertility and disease, and provide input for clinical tools and better patient management.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksGenome-Wide Association StudyAgingAnimalsFemaleHumansMenopauseOvarian ReservePolycystic Ovary Syndromemenopauseovarian reservepolycystic ovary syndromepremature ovarian insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID27221566
PMCPMC7610559
OpenAlexW2407451224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.