Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27221539›Full record

ReviewCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2016

Rationale for Developing a Specimen Bank to Study the Pathogenesis of High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: A Review of the Evidence.

Mark E Sherman, Ronny I Drapkin, Neil S Horowitz, Christopher P Crum, Sue Friedman, Janice S Kwon, Douglas A Levine, Ie-Ming Shih, Donna Shoupe, Elizabeth M Swisher and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pathogenesis and heterogeneity of ovarian cancer.Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark E ShermanDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, Maryland. ShermanM@mail.nih.gov.
Ronny I DrapkinThe Penn Ovarian Cancer Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Neil S HorowitzDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Christopher P CrumDivision of Women's and Perinatal Pathology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sue FriedmanFacing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered (FORCE), Tampa, Florida.
Janice S KwonDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia and BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Douglas A LevineGynecologic Oncology, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY.
Ie-Ming ShihDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Donna ShoupeDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Elizabeth M SwisherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Joan WalkerDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Peggy and Charles Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Britton TrabertDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Mark H GreeneDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Goli SamimiDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, Maryland.
Sarah M TemkinDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, Maryland. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lori M MinasianDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

Intervention Trials in Persons at Increased Genetic Risk of CancerZIACP010145 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI SAVAGE, SHARON A. · 2009 to 2025
$12.2M
Defining a Pre-Malignant Phenotype in Fallopian Tube EpitheliumR01CA131965 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SWISHER, ELIZABETH MARY · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
p53 signatures and pelvic serous carcinomaR21CA124688 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI CRUM, CHRISTOPHER PAUL · 2007 to 2009
$420k
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131965NCI NIH HHS R21 CA124688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women with clinically detected high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC) generally present with advanced-stage disease, which portends a poor prognosis, despite extensive surgery and intensive chemotherapy. Historically, HGSCs were presumed to arise from the ovarian surface epithelium (OSE), but the inability to identify early-stage HGSCs and their putative precursors in the ovary dimmed prospects for advancing our knowledge of the pathogenesis of these tumors and translating these findings into effective prevention strategies. Over the last decade, increased BRCA1/2 mutation testing coupled with performance of risk-reducing surgeries has enabled studies that have provided strong evidence that many, but probably not all, HGSCs among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers appear to arise from the fallopian tubes, rather than from the ovaries. This shift in our understanding of the pathogenesis of HGSCs provides an important opportunity to achieve practice changing advances; however, the scarcity of clinically annotated tissues containing early lesions, particularly among women at average risk, poses challenges to progress. Accordingly, we review studies that have kindled our evolving understanding of the pathogenesis of HGSC and present the rationale for developing an epidemiologically annotated national specimen resource to support this research. Cancer Prev Res; 9(9); 713-20. ©2016 AACR.

Indexed as

Cystadenocarcinoma, SerousOvarian NeoplasmsTissue BanksFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID27221539
PMCPMC5010984
OpenAlexW2395498402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.