Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27221533›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2016

Further evidence for population specific differences in the effect of DNA markers and gender on eye colour prediction in forensics.

Ewelina Pośpiech, Joanna Karłowska-Pik, Bartosz Ziemkiewicz, Magdalena Kukla, Małgorzata Skowron, Anna Wojas-Pelc, Wojciech Branicki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Why humans evolved blue eyes.Frontiers in psychology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Interpol review of forensic biology and forensic DNA typing 2016-2019.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ewelina PośpiechInstitute of Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Earth Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland. ewelina.pospiech@uj.edu.pl.
Joanna Karłowska-PikFaculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland.
Bartosz ZiemkiewiczFaculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland.
Magdalena KuklaFaculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Małgorzata SkowronDepartment of Dermatology, Collegium Medicum of the Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Anna Wojas-PelcDepartment of Dermatology, Collegium Medicum of the Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Wojciech BranickiMalopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetics of eye colour has been extensively studied over the past few years, and the identified polymorphisms have been applied with marked success in the field of Forensic DNA Phenotyping. A picture that arises from evaluation of the currently available eye colour prediction markers shows that only the analysis of HERC2-OCA2 complex has similar effectiveness in different populations, while the predictive potential of other loci may vary significantly. Moreover, the role of gender in the explanation of human eye colour variation should not be neglected in some populations. In the present study, we re-investigated the data for 1020 Polish individuals and using neural networks and logistic regression methods explored predictive capacity of IrisPlex SNPs and gender in this population sample. In general, neural networks provided higher prediction accuracy comparing to logistic regression (AUC increase by 0.02-0.06). Four out of six IrisPlex SNPs were associated with eye colour in the studied population. HERC2 rs12913832, OCA2 rs1800407 and SLC24A4 rs12896399 were found to be the most important eye colour predictors (p < 0.007) while the effect of rs16891982 in SLC45A2 was less significant. Gender was found to be significantly associated with eye colour with males having ~1.5 higher odds for blue eye colour comparing to females (p = 0.002) and was ranked as the third most important factor in blue/non-blue eye colour determination. However, the implementation of gender into the developed prediction models had marginal and ambiguous impact on the overall accuracy of prediction confirming that the effect of gender on eye colour in this population is small. Our study indicated the advantage of neural networks in prediction modeling in forensics and provided additional evidence for population specific differences in the predictive importance of the IrisPlex SNPs and gender.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAntiportersEye ColorFemaleGenetics, PopulationGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMembrane Transport ProteinsNeural Networks, ComputerPolandSex FactorsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesAntiportersGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsHERC2 protein, humanMembrane Transport ProteinsOCA2 protein, humanSLC24A4 protein, humanUbiquitin-Protein LigasesEye colour predictionForensic DNA Phenotyping (FDP)Gender effectIrisPlex SNPsLogistic regressionNeural networks

Identifiers

PMID27221533
PMCPMC4912978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.