ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2016
Erratum to: Dual-phase amyloid PET: hitting two birds with one stone.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping Alzheimer's disease heterogeneity with molecular imaging biomarkers.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Early-phaseEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Sex differences in the association of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers and cognition in a multicenter memory clinic study.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Article
- A deep learning model for generating [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Amyloid PET Imaging: Standard Procedures and Semiquantification.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Molecular imaging of multiple sclerosis: from the clinical demand to novel radiotracers.EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2019Review
- Dual-phase [18F]florbetapir in frontotemporal dementia.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019Article
- Can 11C-PiB-PET Relative Delivery R1 or 11C-PiB-PET Perfusion Replace 18F-FDG-PET in the Assessment of Brain Neurodegeneration?Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2018Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
27221519What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.