Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27221456›Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2016

A multicenter report of biologic agents for the treatment of secondary amyloidosis in Turkish rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis patients.

Ömer Nuri Pamuk, Umut Kalyoncu, Kenan Aksu, Ahmet Omma, Yavuz Pehlivan, Yonca Çağatay, Orhan Küçükşahin, Salim Dönmez, Gözde Yıldırım Çetin, Rıdvan Mercan and 14 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Ömer Nuri PamukDivision of Rheumatology, Trakya University Medical Faculty, Edirne, Turkey. onpamuk@gmail.com.
Umut KalyoncuDivision of Rheumatology, Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey.
Kenan AksuDivision of Rheumatology, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey.
Ahmet OmmaDivision of Rheumatology, Ankara Numune Research and Education Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Yavuz PehlivanDivision of Rheumatology, Uludag University Medical Faculty, Bursa, Turkey.
Yonca ÇağatayDivision of Rheumatology, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Orhan KüçükşahinDivision of Rheumatology, Ankara Numune Research and Education Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Salim DönmezDivision of Rheumatology, Trakya University Medical Faculty, Edirne, Turkey.
Gözde Yıldırım ÇetinDivision of Rheumatology, Sütçü İmam University Medical Faculty, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey.
Rıdvan MercanHatay State Hospital, Hatay, Turkey.
Özün BayındırDivision of Rheumatology, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey.
Ayşe ÇefleDivision of Rheumatology, Kocaeli University Medical Faculty, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Fatih YıldızVan Research and Education Hospital, Van, Turkey.
Ayşe BalkarlıDivision of Rheumatology, Pamukkale University Medical Faculty, Denizli, Turkey.
Levent KılıçDivision of Rheumatology, Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey.
Necati ÇakırDivision of Rheumatology, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Research and Education Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bünyamin KısacıkDivision of Rheumatology, Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Mustafa Ferhat ÖksüzDivision of Rheumatology, Uludag University Medical Faculty, Bursa, Turkey.
Veli ÇobankaraDivision of Rheumatology, Pamukkale University Medical Faculty, Denizli, Turkey.
Ahmet Mesut OnatDivision of Rheumatology, Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Mehmet SayarlıoğluDivision of Rheumatology, Ondokuz Mayıs University Medical Faculty, Samsun, Turkey.
Mehmet Akif ÖztürkDivision of Rheumatology, Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey.
Gülsüm Emel PamukDivision of Hematology, Trakya University Medical Faculty, Edirne, Turkey.
Nurullah AkkoçDivision of Rheumatology, Dokuz Eylül University Medical Faculty, Edirne, Turkey.
Trakya University · TRAnkara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRBursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ · TREge University · TRGaziantep University · TRHacettepe University · TRPamukkale University · TRDokuz Eylül University · TRFatih Sultan Mehmet Eğitim Ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRGazi University · TRIstanbul Medipol University · TRKahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University · TRKocaeli Üniversitesi · TROndokuz Mayıs University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this multicenter, retrospective study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of biologic therapies, including anti-TNFs, in secondary (AA) amyloidosis patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In addition, the frequency of secondary amyloidosis in RA and AS patients in a single center was estimated. Fifty-one AS (39M, 12F, mean age: 46.7) and 30 RA patients (11M, 19F, mean age: 51.7) with AA amyloidosis from 16 different centers in Turkey were included. Clinical and demographical features of patients were obtained from medical charts. A composite response index (CRI) to biologic therapy-based on creatinine level, proteinuria and disease activity-was used to evaluate the efficacy of treatment. The mean annual incidence of AA amyloidosis in RA and AS patients was 0.23 and 0.42/1000 patients/year, respectively. The point prevalence in RA and AS groups was 4.59 and 7.58/1000, respectively. In RA group with AA amyloidosis, effective response was obtained in 52.2 % of patients according to CRI. RA patients with RF positivity and more initial disease activity tended to have higher response rates to therapy (p values, 0.069 and 0.056). After biologic therapy (median 17 months), two RA patients died and two developed tuberculosis. In AS group, 45.7 % of patients fulfilled the criteria of good response according to CRI. AS patients with higher CRP levels at the time of AA diagnosis and at the beginning of anti-TNF therapy had higher response rates (p values, 0.011 and 0.017). During follow-up after anti-TNF therapy (median 38 months), one patient died and tuberculosis developed in two patients. Biologic therapy seems to be effective in at least half of RA and AS patients with AA amyloidosis. Tuberculosis was the most important safety concern.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmyloidosisArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansImmunocompromised HostImmunosuppressive AgentsIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedOpportunistic InfectionsPrevalenceRemission InductionBiological ProductsImmunosuppressive AgentsTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAnkylosing spondylitisAnti-TNFBiologic therapyRheumatoid arthritisSecondary amyloidosis

Identifiers

PMID27221456
OpenAlexW2408059953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.