ArticleInternational ophthalmology2017
Ganciclovir ophthalmic gel treatment shortens the recovery time and prevents complications in the adenoviral eye infection.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Viral Conjunctivitis.Viruses · 2023Review
- Antiviral Drugs in Adenovirus-Induced Keratoconjunctivitis.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Management of Adenoviral Keratoconjunctivitis: Challenges and Solutions.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of ganciclovir ophthalmic gel (GOG) in the treatment of adenoviral eye infection (AEI) by looking at the effect of the drug on shortening recovery time, preventing transmission, reducing sequelae, and on complications such as corneal infiltrates and conjunctival pseudomembranes. 200 patients' examination records were evaluated retrospectively. Patients who were within the first 3 days of AEI were divided into two groups: Group 1 with 100 patients who used artificial tears as treatment, and Group 2 with 100 patients who used GOG plus artificial tears (GAT). All patients underwent an eye examination by the same ophthalmologist on the 1st, 5th, 10th, and 15th day after treatment. Using the examination records, variables were compared using SPSS 22.0. There was a statistically significant difference between Groups 1 and 2. Group 2 showed better and faster response to treatment. There was less transmission to the contralateral eye and environment, and less formation of corneal subepithelial infiltrate and conjunctival pseudomembrane in Group 2. Only three patients in Group 2 had corneal involvement. A comparison of each group pre-treatment and during treatment revealed improved signs and symptoms in Group 2 (p < 0.005). The study showed a trend toward more rapid improvement, less corneal and conjunctival involvement, and less transmission to the contralateral eye and environment in the GAT group. These results need to be confirmed by additional studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.