ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2016
Evaluation of
Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- NGR-Based Radiopharmaceuticals for Angiogenesis Imaging: A Preclinical Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Therapeutic Performance Evaluation ofPharmaceutics · 2023Article
- The Role of VEGF Receptors as Molecular Target in Nuclear Medicine for Cancer Diagnosis and Combination Therapy.Cancers · 2021Review
- Synthesis and evaluation ofJournal of Cancer · 2021Article
- Cell Penetrating Peptides, Novel Vectors for Gene Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2020Review
- Molecular Imaging of Aminopeptidase N in Cancer and Angiogenesis.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2018Review
- Research Progress of Radiolabeled Asn-Gly-Arg (NGR) Peptides for Imaging and Therapy.Molecular imagingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.