ArticleEcology2016
Balls, cups, and quasi-potentials: quantifying stability in stochastic systems.
Article in Ecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards Operationalizing Ecological Resilience for Infrastructure Decision-Making.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026Article
- Reconstructing community dynamics from limited observations.Microbiome · 2026Article
- Nonlinear effects of noise on outbreaks of mosquito-borne diseases.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Microbiome assembly statistics toward ecosystem-scale insights, forecasting, and management.The ISME journal · 2026Review
- Multiple resiliency metrics reveal complementary drivers of ecosystem persistence: An application to kelp forest systems.Ecology · 2024Article
- Life-history speed, population disappearances and noise-induced ratchet effects.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Rising temperature drives tipping points in mutualistic networks.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Community structure determines the predictability of population collapse.The Journal of animal ecology · 2022Article
- Kelp-forest dynamics controlled by substrate complexity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Effects of stochasticity on the length and behaviour of ecological transients.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Article
- Unifying deterministic and stochastic ecological dynamics via a landscape-flux approach.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Topological analysis reveals state transitions in human gut and marine bacterial communities.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2020Article
- Dysregulated biodynamics in metabolic attractor systems precede the emergence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Climbing Escher's stairs: A way to approximate stability landscapes in multidimensional systems.PLoS computational biology · 2020Review
- The ecological and epidemiological consequences of reproductive interference between the vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019Article
- Eigenvalues of the covariance matrix as early warning signals for critical transitions in ecological systems.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Crossing the quasi-threshold manifold of a noise-driven excitable system.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When a system has more than one stable state, how can the stability of these states be compared? This deceptively simple question has important consequences for ecosystems, because systems with alternative stable states can undergo dramatic regime shifts. The probability, frequency, duration, and dynamics of these shifts will all depend on the relative stability of the stable states. Unfortunately, the concept of "stability" in ecology has suffered from substantial confusion and this is particularly problematic for systems where stochastic perturbations can cause shifts between coexisting alternative stable states. A useful way to visualize stable states in stochastic systems is with a ball-in-cup-diagram, in which the state of the system is represented as the position of a ball rolling on a surface, and the random perturbations can push the ball from one basin of attraction to another. The surface is determined by a potential function, which provides a natural stability metric. Systems amenable to this representation, called gradient systems, are quite rare, however. As a result, the potential function is not widely used and other approaches based on linear stability analysis have become standard. Linear stability analysis is designed for local analysis of deterministic systems and, as we show, can produce a highly misleading picture of how the system will behave under continual, stochastic perturbations. In this paper, we show how the potential function can be generalized so that it can be applied broadly, employing a concept from stochastic analysis called the quasi-potential. Using three classic ecological models, we demonstrate that the quasi-potential provides a useful way to quantify stability in stochastic systems. We show that the quasi-potential framework helps clarify long-standing confusion about stability in stochastic ecological systems, and we argue that ecologists should adopt it as a practical tool for analyzing these systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.