ArticleMedical care2016
Characteristics and Service Use of Medicare Beneficiaries Using Federally Qualified Health Centers.
Article in Medical care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adjunctive Psychosocial Interventions and Opioid Abstinence Among Patients Receiving Buprenorphine: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Federally Qualified Health Centers and Performance of Medicare Accountable Care Organizations.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Hospital-Based Care Among Dual Eligibles Who Use Health Centers.Health equity · 2023Article
- Health center use and hospital-based care among individuals dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid, 2012-2018.Health services research · 2022Article
- National profile of the growing population of older adults who access community health centers.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2021Article
- Social Risks Among Primary Care Patients in a Large Urban Health System.American journal of preventive medicine · 2020Article
- African Americans Want a Focus on Shared Decision-Making in Asthma Adherence Interventions.The patient · 2020Article
- Geographic Expansion of Federally Qualified Health Centers 2007-2014.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2019Article
- Shared decision-making in the BREATHE asthma intervention trial: A research protocol.Journal of advanced nursing · 2019Article
- Utilization of health care services among Medicare beneficiaries who visit federally qualified health centers.BMC health services research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFederally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) provide primary care for millions of Americans, but little is known about Medicare beneficiaries who use FQHCs.
objectiveTo compare patient characteristics and health care service use among Medicare beneficiaries stratified by FQHC use. RESEARCH
designCross-sectional analysis of 2011 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years and older. SUBJECTS: Subjects included beneficiaries with at least 1 evaluation and management (E&M) visit in 2011, categorized as FQHC users (≥1 E&M visit to FQHCs) or nonusers living in the same primary care service areas as FQHC users. Users were subclassified as predominant if the majority of their E&M visits were to FQHCs. MEASURES: Demographic characteristics, physician visits, and inpatient care use.
resultsMost FQHC users (56.6%) were predominant users. Predominant and nonpredominant users, compared with nonusers, markedly differed by prevalence of multiple chronic conditions (18.2%, 31.7% vs. 22.7%) and annual mortality (2.8%, 3.8% vs. 4.0%; all P<0.05). In adjusted analyses (reference: nonusers), predominant users had fewer physician visits (RR=0.81; 95% CI, 0.81-0.81) and fewer hospitalizations (RR=0.84; 95% CI, 0.84-0.85), whereas nonpredominant users had higher use of both types of service (RR=1.18, 95% CI, 1.18-1.18; RR=1.09, 95% CI, 1.08-1.10, respectively).
conclusionsEven controlling for primary care delivery markets, nonpredominant FQHC users had a higher burden of chronic illness and service use than predominant FQHC users. It will be important to monitor Medicare beneficiaries using FQHCs to understand whether primary care only payment incentives for FQHCs could induce fragmented care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.