Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27219107›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Emergence of a New Population of Rathayibacter toxicus: An Ecologically Complex, Geographically Isolated Bacterium.

Mohammad Arif, Grethel Y Busot, Rachel Mann, Brendan Rodoni, Sanzhen Liu, James P Stack

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antibiotic resistance genes in the Actinobacteria phylum.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparative Genome Analysis ofThe plant pathology journal · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammad ArifDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
Grethel Y BusotDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
Rachel MannDepartment of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Biosciences Research Division, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Brendan RodoniDepartment of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Biosciences Research Division, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Sanzhen LiuDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
James P StackDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
Kansas State University · USPlant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rathayibacter toxicus is a gram-positive bacterium that infects the floral parts of several Poaceae species in Australia. Bacterial ooze is often produced on the surface of infected plants and bacterial galls are produced in place of seed. R. toxicus is a regulated plant pathogen in the U.S. yet reliable detection and diagnostic tools are lacking. To better understand this geographically-isolated plant pathogen, genetic variation as a function of geographic location, host species, and date of isolation was determined for isolates collected over a forty-year period. Discriminant analyses of recently collected and archived isolates using Multi-Locus Sequence Typing (MLST) and Inter-Simple Sequence Repeats (ISSR) identified three populations of R. toxicus; RT-I and RT-II from South Australia and RT-III from Western Australia. Population RT-I, detected in 2013 and 2014 from the Yorke Peninsula in South Australia, is a newly emerged population of R. toxicus not previously reported. Commonly used housekeeping genes failed to discriminate among the R. toxicus isolates. However, strategically selected and genome-dispersed MLST genes representing an array of cellular functions from chromosome replication, antibiotic resistance and biosynthetic pathways to bacterial acquired immunity were discriminative. Genetic variation among isolates within the RT-I population was less than the within-population variation for the previously reported RT-II and RT-III populations. The lower relative genetic variation within the RT-I population and its absence from sampling over the past 40 years suggest its recent emergence. RT-I was the dominant population on the Yorke Peninsula during the 2013-2014 sampling period perhaps indicating a competitive advantage over the previously detected RT-II population. The potential for introduction of this bacterial plant pathogen into new geographic areas provide a rationale for understanding the ecological and evolutionary trajectories of R. toxicus.

Indexed as

AustraliaBacterial Typing TechniquesDiscriminant AnalysisGenetic VariationMicrococcaceaeMicrosatellite RepeatsMultilocus Sequence TypingPhylogenyPlantsRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID27219107
PMCPMC4878776
OpenAlexW2397207886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.