ArticleHLA2016
A comparative reference study for the validation of HLA-matching algorithms in the search for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell donors and cord blood units.
Article in HLA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- In silico prediction of nonpermissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches in unrelated HCT by functional distance.Blood advances · 2018Trial
- GRIMM-II: A two-stage real-time algorithm for nine-locus HLA imputation and matching with up to three mismatches.Human immunology · 2026Article
- GRIMM-II: A Two-Stage Real-Time Algorithm for Nine-Locus HLA Imputation and Matching with Up to Three Mismatches.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Combined imputation of HLA genotype and self-identified race leads to better donor-recipient matching.Human immunology · 2023Article
- Estimating HLA haplotype frequencies from homozygous individuals - A Technical Report.International journal of immunogenetics · 2021Article
- Hap-E Search 2.0: Improving the Performance of a Probabilistic Donor-Recipient Matching Algorithm Based on Haplotype Frequencies.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Article
- Estimation of German KIR Allele Group Haplotype Frequencies.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Article
- Tools for building, analyzing and evaluating HLA haplotypes from families.Human immunology · 2019Review
- Common and well-documented HLA alleles of German stem cell donors by haplotype frequency estimation.HLA · 2018Article
- Directionality of non-permissive HLA-DPB1 T-cell epitope group mismatches does not improve clinical risk stratification in 8/8 matched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation.Bone marrow transplantation · 2017Article
- HLA-DP in unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation revisited: challenges and opportunities.Blood · 2017Review
- Hapl-o-Mat: open-source software for HLA haplotype frequency estimation from ambiguous and heterogeneous data.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- HLA Amino Acid Polymorphisms and Kidney Allograft Survival.Transplantation · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accuracy of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matching algorithms is a prerequisite for the correct and efficient identification of optimal unrelated donors for patients requiring hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The goal of this World Marrow Donor Association study was to validate established matching algorithms from different international donor registries by challenging them with simulated input data and subsequently comparing the output. This experiment addressed three specific aspects of HLA matching using different data sets for tasks of increasing complexity. The first two tasks targeted the traditional matching approach identifying discrepancies between patient and donor HLA genotypes by counting antigen and allele differences. Contemporary matching procedures predicting the probability for HLA identity using haplotype frequencies were addressed by the third task. In each task, the identified disparities between the results of the participating computer programs were analyzed, classified and quantified. This study led to a deep understanding of the algorithms participating and finally produced virtually identical results. The unresolved discrepancies total to less than 1%, 4% and 2% for the three tasks and are mostly because of individual decisions in the design of the programs. Based on these findings, reference results for the three input data sets were compiled that can be used to validate future matching algorithms and thus improve the quality of the global donor search process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.