Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27219013›Full record

ArticleHLA2016

A comparative reference study for the validation of HLA-matching algorithms in the search for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell donors and cord blood units.

W Bochtler, L Gragert, Z I Patel, J Robinson, D Steiner, J A Hofmann, J Pingel, A Baouz, A Melis, J Schneider and 5 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in HLA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

W BochtlerZentrales Knochenmarkspender-Register Deutschland (ZKRD), Ulm, Germany.
L GragertNational Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5945-6518
Z I PatelAnthony Nolan Research Institute (ANRI), Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
J RobinsonAnthony Nolan Research Institute (ANRI), Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
D SteinerCzech Stem Cells Registry (CSCR) and Department of Cybernetics, Czech Technical University, Prague, Czech Republic.
J A HofmannDKMS German Bone Marrow Donor Center, Tübingen, Germany.
J PingelDKMS German Bone Marrow Donor Center, Tübingen, Germany.
A BaouzAgence de la biomedecine - Registre France Greffe de Moelle (FGM), Paris, France.
A MelisBone Marrow Donors Worldwide (BMDW) and Europdonor operated by Matchis, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J SchneiderNational Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, MN, USA.
H-P EberhardZentrales Knochenmarkspender-Register Deutschland (ZKRD), Ulm, Germany.
M OudshoornBone Marrow Donors Worldwide (BMDW) and Europdonor operated by Matchis, Leiden, The Netherlands.
S G E MarshAnthony Nolan Research Institute (ANRI), Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
M MaiersNational Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, MN, USA.
C R MüllerZentrales Knochenmarkspender-Register Deutschland (ZKRD), Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accuracy of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matching algorithms is a prerequisite for the correct and efficient identification of optimal unrelated donors for patients requiring hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The goal of this World Marrow Donor Association study was to validate established matching algorithms from different international donor registries by challenging them with simulated input data and subsequently comparing the output. This experiment addressed three specific aspects of HLA matching using different data sets for tasks of increasing complexity. The first two tasks targeted the traditional matching approach identifying discrepancies between patient and donor HLA genotypes by counting antigen and allele differences. Contemporary matching procedures predicting the probability for HLA identity using haplotype frequencies were addressed by the third task. In each task, the identified disparities between the results of the participating computer programs were analyzed, classified and quantified. This study led to a deep understanding of the algorithms participating and finally produced virtually identical results. The unresolved discrepancies total to less than 1%, 4% and 2% for the three tasks and are mostly because of individual decisions in the design of the programs. Based on these findings, reference results for the three input data sets were compiled that can be used to validate future matching algorithms and thus improve the quality of the global donor search process.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAllelesCord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationRegistriesDatasets as TopicGene FrequencyHaplotypesHistocompatibility TestingHLA AntigensHumansTransplantation, HomologousTransplant RecipientsUnrelated DonorsHLA Antigensdonor registryhematopoietic stem cell transplantationhuman leukocyte antigenimmunogeneticsmatching algorithmpatient-donor matching

Identifiers

PMID27219013
PMCPMC5089599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.