Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27218453›Full record

ArticleeLife2016

Cell-specific synaptic plasticity induced by network oscillations.

Shota Zarnadze, Peter Bäuerle, Julio Santos-Torres, Claudia Böhm, Dietmar Schmitz, Jörg Rp Geiger, Tamar Dugladze, Tengis Gloveli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The Excessive Tonic Inhibition of the Peri-infarct Cortex Depresses Low Gamma Rhythm Power During Poststroke Recovery.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Retrosplenial and Hippocampal Synchrony during Retrieval of Old Memories in Macaques.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mechanisms of neural organization and rhythmogenesis during hippocampal and cortical ripples.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shota ZarnadzeInstitute of Neurophysiology, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Peter BäuerleInstitute of Neurophysiology, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Julio Santos-TorresInstitute of Neurophysiology, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Claudia BöhmNeuroscience Research Center, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Dietmar SchmitzNeuroscience Research Center, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jörg Rp GeigerInstitute of Neurophysiology, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Tamar DugladzeInstitute of Neurophysiology, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Tengis GloveliInstitute of Neurophysiology, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2209-375X
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gamma rhythms are known to contribute to the process of memory encoding. However, little is known about the underlying mechanisms at the molecular, cellular and network levels. Using local field potential recording in awake behaving mice and concomitant field potential and whole-cell recordings in slice preparations we found that gamma rhythms lead to activity-dependent modification of hippocampal networks, including alterations in sharp wave-ripple complexes. Network plasticity, expressed as long-lasting increases in sharp wave-associated synaptic currents, exhibits enhanced excitatory synaptic strength in pyramidal cells that is induced postsynaptically and depends on metabotropic glutamate receptor-5 activation. In sharp contrast, alteration of inhibitory synaptic strength is independent of postsynaptic activation and less pronounced. Further, we found a cell type-specific, directionally biased synaptic plasticity of two major types of GABAergic cells, parvalbumin- and cholecystokinin-expressing interneurons. Thus, we propose that gamma frequency oscillations represent a network state that introduces long-lasting synaptic plasticity in a cell-specific manner.

Indexed as

AnimalsCholecystokininExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsGABAergic NeuronsGamma RhythmGene ExpressionHippocampusInterneuronsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNerve NetNeuronal PlasticityOrgan SpecificityParvalbuminsPatch-Clamp TechniquesPyramidal CellsCholecystokininParvalbuminsReceptor, Metabotropic Glutamate 5gamma rhythmsinterneuronmGluR5mouseneurosciencepatch-clamp methodologysharp wave ripplessynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID27218453
PMCPMC4929000
OpenAlexW2397224166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.