ArticleSurgical neurology international2016
Socioeconomic status does not affect prognosis in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Socioeconomic status as a determinant of survival in glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Socioeconomic disparities in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma survival: interactions between age and household income in a SEER cohort.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- The impact of sociodemographic background on clinical presentation of high-grade gliomas: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Socioeconomic influences on survival outcome in idh-wildtype glioma patients: examining the role of age, education, and lifestyle factors.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- Economic income and survival in patients affected by glioblastoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neuro-oncology practice · 2024Review
- Association of county-level socioeconomic status with meningioma incidence and outcomes.Neuro-oncology · 2024Article
- Area-level socioeconomic status is positively correlated with glioblastoma incidence and prognosis in the United States.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Racial Disparities in Malignant Primary Brain Tumor Survival in Texas From 1995 to 2013.Cureus · 2020Article
- Racial and socioeconomic disparities differentially affect overall and cause-specific survival in glioblastoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2020Article
- Identifying Disparities in Care in Treating Glioblastoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Patients Treated at a Safety-net Versus Private Hospital Setting.World neurosurgery · 2020Article
- Insurance correlates with improved access to care and outcome among glioblastoma patients.Neuro-oncology · 2018Article
- Disparities in health care determine prognosis in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.Neurosurgical focus · 2018Article
- Angiotensinogen rs5050 germline genetic variant as potential biomarker of poor prognosis in astrocytoma.PloS one · 2018Article
- The effect of socioeconomic status on gross total resection, radiation therapy and overall survival in patients with gliomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2017Article
- Missing diversity in brain tumor trials.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
- Sociodemographic factors predict outcomes and reveal spatial tumor patterns in glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an aggressive malignancy, but there is marked heterogeneity in survival time. Health care disparities have demonstrated significance in oncologic outcomes but have not been clearly examined in this patient population. We investigated the role of sociodemographic variables in the prognosis of adult patients diagnosed with GBM.
methodsThis retrospective analysis included patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of GBM, who underwent resection or biopsy at a single institution from 2000 to 2014. Socioeconomic status (SES) was determined by household income according to the US Census zip code tabulation areas and the US national poverty level. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis calculated effects on patient survival.
resultsThirty percent of 218 subjects were of low SES, 57% mid, and 13% high. Low SES patients tended to be male (62%), Caucasian (92%), unmarried (91%), have dependents (100%), and limited to high school education (55%). SES did not predict insurance or employment status. SES was associated with marital status and number of cohabitants (P < 0.0001) but not clinical trial enrollment. Multivariate analysis demonstrated no relationship between SES and survival. Shorter prognosis was associated with history of military service (hazard ratio [HR] 2.06, P = 0.0125), elderly patients (HR 1.70, P = 0.0158), and multifocal disease (HR 1.75, P = 0.0119). Longer prognosis was associated with gross total resection (HR 0.49, P = 0.0009), radiation therapy (HR 0.12, P < 0.0001), and temozolomide (HR 0.28, P < 0.0001).
conclusionsSES alone does not predict prognosis in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. Sociodemographic variables such as old age, military service record, and insurance type may have a prognostication role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.