ArticleCancer nanotechnology
Nanotechnology and cancer: improving real-time monitoring and staging of bladder cancer with multimodal mesoporous silica nanoparticles.
Article in Cancer nanotechnology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Smart mesoporous silica nanoparticles for precision cancer therapy: Tumor targeting and stimuli-responsive controlled release.Smart molecules : open access · 2026Review
- Nanorobots and Exosomes: Driving the New Frontier for Bladder Tumors through Non-Coding RNAs.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Clinical insights into nanomedicine and biosafety: advanced therapeutic approaches for common urological cancers.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Review
- Nanoparticle-Based Techniques for Bladder Cancer Imaging: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Nanomedicine for Combination Urologic Cancer Immunotherapy.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Current applications of nanomaterials in urinary system tumors.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Enhance the Anticancer Efficacy of Platinum(IV)-Phenolate Conjugates in Breast Cancer Cell Lines.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Demethylation of the NRF2 Promoter Protects Against Carcinogenesis Induced by Nano-SiOFrontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Tracking embryonic hematopoietic stem cells to the bone marrow: nanoparticle options to evaluate transplantation efficiency.Stem cell research & therapy · 2018Article
- Multifunctional nanomedicine with silica: Role of silica in nanoparticles for theranostic, imaging, and drug monitoring.Journal of colloid and interface science · 2018Review
- Multifunctional nanoparticles for real-time evaluation of toxicity during fetal development.PloS one · 2018Article
- Increased endocytosis of magnetic nanoparticles into cancerous urothelial cells versus normal urothelial cells.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2018Article
- Biocompatibility of Multi-Imaging Engineered Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles:Journal of biomedical nanotechnology · 2017Article
- A Murine Orthotopic Bladder Tumor Model and Tumor Detection System.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite being one of the most common cancers, bladder cancer is largely inefficiently and inaccurately staged and monitored. Current imaging methods detect cancer only when it has reached "visible" size and has significantly disrupted the structure of the organ. By that time, thousands of cells will have proliferated and perhaps metastasized. Repeated biopsies and scans are necessary to determine the effect of therapy on cancer growth. In this report, we describe a novel approach based on multimodal nanoparticle contrast agent technology and its application to a preclinical animal model of bladder cancer. The innovation relies on the engineering core of mesoporous silica with specific scanning contrast properties and surface modification that include fluorescence and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast. The overall dimensions of the nano-device are preset at 80-180 nm, depending on composition with a pore size of 2 nm.
methodsTo facilitate and expedite discoveries, we combined a well-known model of bladder cancer and our novel technology. We exposed nanoparticles to MB49 murine bladder cancer cells in vitro and found that 70 % of the cells were labeled by nanoparticles as measured by flow cytometry. The in vivo mouse model for bladder cancer is particularly well suited for T1- and T2-weighted MRI.
resultsUnder our experimental conditions, we demonstrate that the nanoparticles considerably improve tumor definition in terms of volumetric, intensity and structural characteristics. Important bladder tumor parameters can be ascertained, non-invasively, repetitively, and with great accuracy. Furthermore, since the particles are not biodegradable, repetitive injection is not required. This feature allows follow-up diagnostic evaluations during cancer treatment. Changes in MRI signals show that in situ uptake of free particles has predilection to tumor cells relative to normal bladder epithelium. The particle distribution within the tumors was corroborated by fluorescent microscopy of sections of excised bladders. In addition, MRI imaging revealed fibrous finger-like projections into the tumors where particles insinuated themselves deeply. This morphological characteristic was confirmed by fluorescence microscopy.
conclusionsThese findings may present new options for therapeutic intervention. Ultimately, the combination of real-time and repeated MRI evaluation of the tumors enhanced by nanoparticle contrast may have the potential for translation into human clinical studies for tumor staging, therapeutic monitoring, and drug delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.