Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27217800›Full record

ArticleDrug, healthcare and patient safety2016

The virgin land of quality management: a first measure of patient safety climate at the National Hospital of the Faroe Islands.

Solvejg Kristensen, Naina Túgvustein, Hjørdis Zachariassen, Svend Sabroe, Paul Bartels, Jan Mainz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug, healthcare and patient safety, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Solvejg KristensenThe Danish Clinical Registries, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark.
Naina TúgvusteinNational Hospital of the Faroe Islands, Torshavn, Faroe Islands.
Hjørdis ZachariassenNational Hospital of the Faroe Islands, Torshavn, Faroe Islands.
Svend SabroeDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Paul BartelsThe Danish Clinical Registries, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Jan MainzDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark; Aalborg University Hospital, Psychiatry, Aalborg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Faroe Islands are formally part of the Kingdom of Denmark, but the islands enjoy extensive autonomy as home ruled. In Denmark, extensive quality management initiatives have been implemented throughout hospitals, this was not the case in the Faroese Islands in 2013. The purpose of this study is to investigate the patient safety culture in the National Hospital of the Faroe Islands prior to implementation of quality management initiatives.

methodsThe Danish version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ-DK) was distributed electronically to 557 staff members from five medical centers of the hospital, and one administrative unit. SAQ-DK has six cultural dimensions. The proportion of respondents with positive attitudes and mean scale scores were described, and comparison between medical specialties, and between clinical leaders and frontline staff was made using analysis of variance and chi-square test, respectively.

resultsThe response rate was 65.8% (N=367). Job satisfaction was rated most favorable, and the perceived culture of the top management least favorable. Safety climate was the dimension with the greatest variability across the 28 units. The diagnostic center had the most favorable culture of all centers. More leaders than frontline staff had positive attitudes toward teamwork and safety climate, and working conditions, respectively. Also, the leaders perceived these dimensions more positive than the frontline staff, P<0.05. Among three management levels, the unit management was perceived most favorable and the top management least favorable.

conclusionThe management group is recommended to raise awareness of their role in supporting a safe and caring environment for patients and staff, moreover the leaders should ensure that every day work achieves its objectives; keeping the patients safe. Furthermore, following the development in patient safety culture over time is recommended.

Indexed as

clinical leadersfrontline staffmedical specialtiespatient safety culturesafety attitudes questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID27217800
PMCPMC4853140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.