ReviewCancer management and research2016
Multidisciplinary management for esophageal and gastric cancer.
Review in Cancer management and research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health-related quality of life in esophageal cancer: a state-of-the-art review of patient-reported outcomes and an evidence and gap map.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2025Pooled it
- Consensus statement of the Hellenic and Cypriot Oesophageal Cancer Study Group on the diagnosis, staging and management of oesophageal cancer.Updates in surgery · 2019Guideline
- Diagnostic and therapeutic appropriateness in different stages of esophageal/GEJ cancers. The FICOG project.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Article
- Systemic immune inflammation index and gastric cancer prognosis: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024Article
- The impact of preoperative waiting time in Stage II-III gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: A population-based cohort study.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Role of Endoscopy in Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Impact of optional multidisciplinary tumor board meeting on the mortality of patients with gastrointestinal cancer: A retrospective observational study.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2021Observational
- Effect of multidisciplinary team care on survival of oesophageal cancer patients: a retrospective nationwide cohort study.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Real‑world challenge for clinicians treating advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (Review).International journal of oncology · 2021Review
- Development and characteristics of a multidisciplinary colorectal cancer clinic.American journal of surgery · 2021Observational
- Review
- Single modality radical radiotherapy is an acceptable alternative for the older patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Role of a multidisciplinary team in administering radiotherapy for esophageal cancer.BMC cancer · 2020Article
- Contribution of FDG-PET/CT to the management of esophageal cancer patients at multidisciplinary tumor board conferences.European journal of radiology open · 2020Article
- The Role of the Small Bowel in Unintentional Weight Loss after Treatment of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Elevated red blood cell distribution width predicts poor prognosis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer management and research · 2018Article
- Changes in health-related quality of life in oesophagogastric cancer patients participating in palliative and curative therapies.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2018Article
- Post-operative radiotherapy is associated with improved survival in esophageal cancer with positive surgical margins.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of esophageal and gastric cancer is complex and involves multiple specialists in an effort to optimize patient outcomes. Utilizing a multidisciplinary team approach starting from the initial staging evaluation ensures that all members are in agreement with the plan of care. Treatment selection for esophageal and gastric cancer often involves a combination of chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, and palliative interventions (endoscopic and surgical), and direct communication between specialists in these fields is needed to ensure appropriate clinical decision making. At the University of Colorado, the Esophageal and Gastric Multidisciplinary Clinic was created to bring together all experts involved in treating these diseases at a weekly conference in order to provide patients with coordinated, individualized, and patient-centered care. This review details the essential elements and benefits of building a multidisciplinary program focused on treating esophageal and gastric cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.