Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27217773›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2016

Prognostic significance of miR-126 in various cancers: a meta-analysis.

Yuanli Dong, Chengrui Fu, Hui Guan, Zicheng Zhang, Tao Zhou, Baosheng Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multiple Myeloma: Genetic and Epigenetic Biomarkers with Clinical Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Micro RNA Transcriptome Profile in Canine Oral Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Involvement of miR-126 in autoimmune disorders.Clinical and molecular allergy : CMA · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuanli DongSchool of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Jinan, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China; Sixth Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital & Institute, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Chengrui FuSixth Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital & Institute, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Hui GuanSixth Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital & Institute, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Zicheng ZhangSixth Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital & Institute, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Tao ZhouSixth Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital & Institute, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Baosheng LiSixth Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital & Institute, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Shandong Tumor Hospital · CNShandong First Medical University · CNAcademy of Medical Sciences · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRecent studies have demonstrated that microRNA-126 (miR-126) might be a promising prognostic factor for cancer patients. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effectiveness of miR-126 as a prognostic biomarker for various cancers.

methodsThe search of studies was performed by using PubMed and Embase until January 22, 2016. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for patients' survival was calculated. A fixed-effect or random-effects model was applied according to heterogeneity. The trim and fill method was used to adjust pooled HR.

resultsIn all 17 articles comprising of 2,437 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The results indicated that a high level of miR-126 played a favorable role in the overall survival (HR 0.70, 95% CI: 0.62-0.79, random-effects model), with a heterogeneity measure index of I (2)=63.2% (P<0.01). Subgroup analyses showed that pooled HR was more significant in patients with digestive system cancers (HR 0.70, 95% CI: 0.59-0.83, fixed-effects model) and respiratory system cancers (HR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.59-0.85, random-effects model). Owing to publication bias, HR was adjusted to 0.59 (0.463-0.752, P<0.01) by the trim and fill method.

conclusionmiR-126 could be a promising biomarker for cancer prognosis prediction, especially in patients with digestive or respiratory system cancers.

Indexed as

cancermiR-126prognosis

Identifiers

PMID27217773
PMCPMC4853159
OpenAlexW2344225782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.