Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27217768›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2016

E-cadherin expression and prognosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: evidence from 19 published investigations.

Xusheng Ren, Jianning Wang, Xuefen Lin, Xuxia Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The role of cell adhesion molecules in the progression of bladder urothelial carcinomas.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xusheng RenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatological Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Jinan Stomatological Hospital, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Jianning WangDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Jinan Stomatological Hospital, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Xuefen LinDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatological Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China; Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration, Stomatological Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Xuxia WangDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatological Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China; Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration, Stomatological Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to review the published literature and investigate whether E-cadherin gene is a prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by conducting a meta-analysis.

methodsStudies were identified from the databases Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library by using the keywords "E-cadherin gene" and "head and neck cancer". Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were the primary outcome measurements.

resultsOur literature review identified 1,458 articles; 19 studies with a total number of 2,012 cases were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS of patients with decreased expression of E-cadherin gene was 0.57 (95% CI =0.37, 0.89; P=0.000). However, statistical heterogeneity was unacceptably high (I (2)=74.5%, P=0.000). After sensitivity analysis, heterogeneity became acceptable, and the effect measure was still significant (I (2)=7.0%; HR =0.52; 95% CI =0.40, 0.66; P=0.000). The HR for DFS was 0.53 (95% CI =0.42, 0.67; P=0.000).

conclusionThis meta-analysis showed clear evidence that high E-cadherin gene expression is a positive prognostic factor of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, resulting in better OS and DFS. However, this conclusion must be interpreted with caution due to a few limitations.

Indexed as

E-cadherin genehead and neck squamous cell carcinomaimmunohistochemistryprognosis

Identifiers

PMID27217768
PMCPMC4853145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.