Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27217742›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2016

Impact of tiotropium + olodaterol on physical functioning in COPD: results of an open-label observational study.

Rüdiger Sauer, Michaela Hänsel, Roland Buhl, Roman A Rubin, Marcel Frey, Thomas Glaab

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Assessment of physical functioning and handling of tiotropium/olodaterol RespimatInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2019
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Long-acting muscarinic antagonist and long-acting βTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rüdiger SauerLung Centre Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Michaela HänselBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Ingelheim, Germany.
Roland BuhlPulmonary Department, Mainz University Hospital, Mainz, Germany.
Roman A RubinPulmonary Specialist Practice, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Marcel FreyBiometrics, Alcedis GmbH, Gießen, Germany.
Thomas GlaabBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Ingelheim, Germany; Pulmonary Department, Mainz University Hospital, Mainz, Germany.
Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaintaining and improving physical functioning is key to mitigating the cycle of deconditioning associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We evaluated the impact of free combination of the long-acting anticholinergic tiotropium plus the long-acting β2-agonist olodaterol on physical functioning in a real-world clinical setting.

methodsIn this open-label noninterventional study, Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) B-D patients with COPD aged ≥40 years were treated for 4-6 weeks with either tiotropium 5 μg + olodaterol 5 μg (both via Respimat(®) inhaler) or tiotropium 18 μg (HandiHaler(®)) + olodaterol 5 μg (Respimat(®)) once daily. Physical functioning was assessed by the self-reported 10-item Physical Functioning Questionnaire (PF-10). The primary end point was the percentage of patients achieving therapeutic success, defined as a 10-point increase in the PF-10 between baseline (visit 1) and weeks 4-6 (visit 2). Secondary end points included absolute PF-10 scores, Physicians' Global Evaluation, satisfaction with Respimat(®) and adverse events.

resultsA total of 1,858 patients were treated: 1,298 (69.9%) with tiotropium 5 μg + olodaterol 5 μg and 560 (30.1%) with tiotropium 18 μg + olodaterol 5 μg. At study end, 1,683 (92.6%) and 1,556 patients (85.6%) continued using tiotropium and olodaterol, respectively; 48.9% (95% confidence interval: 46.5, 51.3) achieved the primary end point. Therapeutic success rates were significantly higher for maintenance-naïve patients compared to those who had received prior therapy (59.1% vs 44.5%; P<0.0001), largely driven by maintenance-treatment-naïve GOLD B (59.8%) and C (63.0%) patients. Absolute physical functioning scores increased from an average baseline of 44.0 (standard deviation: 25.2) to 54.2 (standard deviation: 26.9) at visit 2. Patients' general condition improved from baseline to visit 2, and patients were largely satisfied with the Respimat(®) inhaler. Adverse events were reported by 7.5% of patients; the most common were respiratory in nature.

conclusionTiotropium + olodaterol improved physical functioning within 4-6 weeks in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD. GOLD B and C patients with no prior maintenance treatment demonstrated the greatest benefit.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAgedBenzoxazinesBronchodilator AgentsCholinergic AntagonistsDrug CombinationsFemaleHealth StatusHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedNebulizers and VaporizersProspective StudiesPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBenzoxazinesBronchodilator AgentsCholinergic AntagonistsDrug CombinationsTiotropium Bromidetiotropium-olodaterolchronic obstructive pulmonary diseasenoninterventionalolodaterolphysical functioningreal-worldtiotropium

Identifiers

PMID27217742
PMCPMC4853152
OpenAlexW2342819368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.