Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27217633›Full record

ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry : JCD

Evaluation of the dentinal wall adaptation ability of MTA Fillapex using stereo electron microscope.

Levent Demiriz, Mustafa Murat Koçak, Sibel Koçak, Baran Can Sağlam, Sevinç Aktemur Türker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Levent DemirizDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Mustafa Murat KoçakDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Sibel KoçakDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Baran Can SağlamDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Sevinç Aktemur TürkerDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn ideal root canal obturation requires a complete dentinal wall adaptation of sealer and Gutta-percha combinations without any gap formations.

aimsThe aim of the study was to evaluate the dentinal wall adaptation ability of MTA Fillapex root canal sealer using stereo electron microscope (SEM).

methodsTwenty-four, single-rooted, human maxillary incisor teeth were used. All canals were prepared with a rotary nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) instrument to a size F3 file. Teeth divided into two equal groups and one of the experimental groups was filled with AH Plus, and the other group was filled with MTA Fillapex using Gutta-percha single cone as a core material. The roots were prepared for SEM evaluation, and serial scanning electron photomicrographs were taken at ×50, ×100, ×500, and ×1000 magnifications. The gaps between the root canal sealer and canal walls were detected and measured in coronal, middle, and apical thirds. For each section, the highest value among the detected gap formations was recorded. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Mann-Whitney U-test, Freidman, and Wilcoxon tests were used.

resultsThe statistical analysis showed no significant difference between two sealers in terms of gap formation (P > 0.05).

conclusionsMTA Fillapex has a similar dentinal wall adaptation ability as AH Plus does.

Indexed as

Adaptationdentinal wallgap formationMTA Fillapexstereo electron microscope

Identifiers

PMID27217633
PMCPMC4872574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.