Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27217599›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2016

Variable Selection with Prior Information for Generalized Linear Models via the Prior LASSO Method.

Yuan Jiang, Yunxiao He, Heping Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Penalized regression with multiple sources of prior effects.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Stability Approach to Regularization Selection for Reduced-Rank Regression.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuan JiangYuan Jiang is an assistant professor at Department of Statistics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-4606. Yunxiao He is an associate director at the Nielsen Company, 770 Broadway, New York, New York 10003-9595. Heping Zhang is a Susan Dwight Bliss Professor at Department of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health, and a Professor at the Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8034. He is also a Chang-Jiang and 1000-plan scholar at Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yunxiao HeYuan Jiang is an assistant professor at Department of Statistics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-4606. Yunxiao He is an associate director at the Nielsen Company, 770 Broadway, New York, New York 10003-9595. Heping Zhang is a Susan Dwight Bliss Professor at Department of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health, and a Professor at the Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8034. He is also a Chang-Jiang and 1000-plan scholar at Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Heping ZhangYuan Jiang is an assistant professor at Department of Statistics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-4606. Yunxiao He is an associate director at the Nielsen Company, 770 Broadway, New York, New York 10003-9595. Heping Zhang is a Susan Dwight Bliss Professor at Department of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health, and a Professor at the Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8034. He is also a Chang-Jiang and 1000-plan scholar at Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

Statistical Methods in Genetic Studies of Substance UseR01DA016750 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, HEPING · 2004 to 2016
$3.3M
Statistical methods for understanding heterogeneity in cocaine relapseR01DA029081 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GUAN, YONGTAO · 2011 to 2013
$1.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016750NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029081Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 076113Wellcome Trust 085475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

LASSO is a popular statistical tool often used in conjunction with generalized linear models that can simultaneously select variables and estimate parameters. When there are many variables of interest, as in current biological and biomedical studies, the power of LASSO can be limited. Fortunately, so much biological and biomedical data have been collected and they may contain useful information about the importance of certain variables. This paper proposes an extension of LASSO, namely, prior LASSO (pLASSO), to incorporate that prior information into penalized generalized linear models. The goal is achieved by adding in the LASSO criterion function an additional measure of the discrepancy between the prior information and the model. For linear regression, the whole solution path of the pLASSO estimator can be found with a procedure similar to the Least Angle Regression (LARS). Asymptotic theories and simulation results show that pLASSO provides significant improvement over LASSO when the prior information is relatively accurate. When the prior information is less reliable, pLASSO shows great robustness to the misspecification. We illustrate the application of pLASSO using a real data set from a genome-wide association study.

Indexed as

Asymptotic efficiencyOracle inequalitiesSolution pathWeak oracle property

Identifiers

PMID27217599
PMCPMC4874534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.