Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27217433›Full record

ReviewCirculation2016

Access to Medications for Cardiovascular Diseases in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Veronika J Wirtz, Warren A Kaplan, Gene F Kwan, Richard O Laing

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
49.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 185 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Potential Impact ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Veronika J WirtzFrom Department of Global Health, School of Public Health (V.J.W., W.A.K., R.O.L.) and Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine (G.F.K.), Boston University School of Medicine, Boston University, MA. vwirtz@bu.edu.
Warren A KaplanFrom Department of Global Health, School of Public Health (V.J.W., W.A.K., R.O.L.) and Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine (G.F.K.), Boston University School of Medicine, Boston University, MA.
Gene F KwanFrom Department of Global Health, School of Public Health (V.J.W., W.A.K., R.O.L.) and Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine (G.F.K.), Boston University School of Medicine, Boston University, MA.
Richard O LaingFrom Department of Global Health, School of Public Health (V.J.W., W.A.K., R.O.L.) and Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine (G.F.K.), Boston University School of Medicine, Boston University, MA.
Boston University · US

Funding

Boston University Medical Center Leadership Program in Vascular MedicineK12HL083781 · NHLBI · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI EBERHARDT, ROBERT THOMAS · 2007 to 2013
$3.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL083781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) represent the highest burden of disease globally. Medicines are a critical intervention used to prevent and treat CVD. This review describes access to medication for CVD from a health system perspective and strategies that have been used to promote access, including providing medicines at lower cost, improving medication supply, ensuring medicine quality, promoting appropriate use, and managing intellectual property issues. Using key evidence in published and gray literature and systematic reviews, we summarize advances in access to cardiovascular medicines using the 5 health system dimensions of access: availability, affordability, accessibility, acceptability, and quality of medicines. There are multiple barriers to access of CVD medicines, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Low availability of CVD medicines has been reported in public and private healthcare facilities. When patients lack insurance and pay out of pocket to purchase medicines, medicines can be unaffordable. Accessibility and acceptability are low for medicines used in secondary prevention; increasing use is positively related to country income. Fixed-dose combinations have shown a positive effect on adherence and intermediate outcome measures such as blood pressure and cholesterol. We have a new opportunity to improve access to CVD medicines by using strategies such as efficient procurement of low-cost, quality-assured generic medicines, development of fixed-dose combination medicines, and promotion of adherence through insurance schemes that waive copayment for long-term medications. Monitoring progress at all levels, institutional, regional, national, and international, is vital to identifying gaps in access and implementing adequate policies.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesDeveloping CountriesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPovertyCardiovascular Agentscardiovascular diseasesdelivery of health caredrug therapyessential drugshealth services accessibilitymedication adherencepolicy

Identifiers

PMID27217433
PMCPMC4880457
OpenAlexW2401773418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.