Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27217308›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of community psychology2016

Universal Prevention Exposure as a Moderator of the Community Context: Findings from the PROSPER Project.

Sarah M Chilenski, Janet A Welsh, Daniel F Perkins, Mark E Feinberg, Mark T Greenberg

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of community psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Family-based prevention programmes for alcohol use in young people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Beyond effectiveness of the Strengthening Families Program (10-14): a scoping RE-AIM-based review.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah M ChilenskiPrevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Janet A WelshPrevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Daniel F PerkinsThe Clearinghouse for Military Family Readiness, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Mark E FeinbergPrevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Mark T GreenbergPrevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.

Funding

Partnership Model for Diffusion of Proven PreventionR01DA013709 · NIDA · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPOTH, RICHARD · 2002 to 2017
$35.0M
Toward a PROSPER State Partnership Network: Building Infrastructure and CapacityRC2DA028879 · NIDA · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPOTH, RICHARD · 2009 to 2010
$2.7M
Adoption and Implementation Support Innovations for PROSPER Partnership-Based EBIR18DP002279 · DP · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GREENBERG, MARK T., SPOTH, RICHARD · 2009 to 2011
$1.3M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS R18 DP002279NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013709NIDA NIH HHS RC2 DA028879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined how participation in a universal family skills-building program may interact with community risks and resources to produce youth outcomes. Prior research has noted community-level variability in risk and protective factors, but thus far no study has examined the role that participation on a community-wide intervention may play in moderating the effects of community risks or resources. The study included 14 communities (seven in Iowa, seven in Pennsylvania) that implemented a family focused evidence-based program as part of the PROSPER project. Community level variables included both risk factors (percent of low income families, the availability of alcohol and tobacco, norms regarding adolescent substance use, incidence of drug-related crimes) and community resources (proactive school leadership, availability of youth-serving organizations, and student involvement in youth activities). The proximal youth and family outcomes included youth perceptions of their parents' management skills, parent-child activities, and family cohesion. Results indicated that the Strengthening Families Program:10-14 may have moderated the impact of the community risks and resources on community-level youth outcomes; risk levels meaningfully associated with community-level change in program participants, though these results varied somewhat by outcome. Generally, higher levels of resources also meaningfully associated with more positive change after participating in the family-focused intervention. These results suggest that the effect of some evidence-based programs may be even stronger in some communities than others; more research in this area is needed.

Indexed as

Illicit DrugsResilience, PsychologicalSmoking PreventionSocial SupportAdolescentAlcoholismChildCommunity Mental Health ServicesEducation, NonprofessionalEvidence-Based PracticeFamily TherapyFemaleHumansJuvenile DelinquencyMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareIllicit DrugsAdaptAdolescenceChange scoresFamily protective factorsGISModeration of interventionPovertyProximal outcomes

Identifiers

PMID27217308
PMCPMC4880454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.