Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27217216›Full record

SynthesisClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2016

Metaanalysis of the Performance of a Combined Treponemal and Nontreponemal Rapid Diagnostic Test for Syphilis and Yaws.

Michael Marks, Yue-Ping Yin, Xiang-Sheng Chen, Arnold Castro, Louise Causer, Rebecca Guy, Regina Wangnapi, Oriol Mitjà, Abdul Aziz, Rita Castro and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Update on syphilis diagnostics.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Point-of-Care Diagnostics for Diagnosis of Active Syphilis Infection: Needs, Challenges and the Way Forward.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 10 countries.

Michael MarksClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
Yue-Ping YinNational Center for STD Control, China Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Xiang-Sheng ChenNational Center for STD Control, China Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Arnold CastroLaboratory Reference & Research Branch, Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Louise CauserKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Rebecca GuyKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Regina WangnapiPapua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Goroka, Eastern Highland Province.
Oriol MitjàBarcelona Institute for Global Health, Barcelona Centre for International Health Research, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Spain.
Abdul AzizGhana Health Services, Accra.
Rita CastroUnidade de Microbiologica Médica, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Lisbon, Portugal.
Filomena da Luz Martins PereiraUnidade de Microbiologica Médica, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Lisbon, Portugal.
Fasihah TaleoMinistry of Health, Port Vila, Vanuatu.
Jérôme GuinardLaboratoire de Microbiologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans.
Laurent BélecLaboratoire de Microbiologie, hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris.
Ye TunCenter for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Christian BottomleyDepartment of Infectious Diseases Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
Ronald C BallardCenter for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
David C W MabeyClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNInstituto de Investigação Científica Tropical · PTUNSW Sydney · AUBarcelona Institute for Global Health · ESCentre hospitalier universitaire d'Orléans · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRGhana Health Service · GHPapua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research · PGVanuatu Cultural Centre · VU

Funding

Wellcome Trust 102807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe human treponematoses are important causes of disease. Mother-to-child transmission of syphilis remains a major cause of stillbirth and neonatal death. There are also almost 100 000 cases of endemic treponemal disease reported annually, predominantly yaws. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) would improve access to screening for these diseases. Most RDTs cannot distinguish current and previous infection. The Dual Path Platform (DPP) Syphilis Screen & Confirm test includes both a treponemal (T1) and nontreponemal (T2) component and may improve the accuracy of diagnosis.

methodsWe conducted a metaanalysis of published and unpublished evaluations of the DPP-RDT for the diagnosis of syphilis and yaws. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and overall agreement of the test compared with reference laboratory tests.

resultsNine evaluations, including 7267 tests, were included. Sensitivity was higher in patients with higher titer rapid plasma reagin (≥1:16) for both the T1 (98.2% vs 90.1%, P < .0001) and the T2 component (98.2% vs 80.6%, P < .0001). Overall agreement between the DPP test and reference serology was 85.2% (84.4%-86.1%). Agreement was highest for high-titer active infection and lowest for past infection.

conclusionsThe RDT has good sensitivity and specificity of the treponemal and nontreponemal components both in cases of suspected syphilis and yaws, although the sensitivity is decreased at lower antibody titers.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care TestingReagent Kits, DiagnosticHumansModels, StatisticalReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySyphilisYawsReagent Kits, Diagnosticmetaanalysispoint-of-care testsexually transmitted infectionssyphilisyaws

Identifiers

PMID27217216
PMCPMC4981758
OpenAlexW2403032254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.