Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27217030›Full record

SynthesisJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2016

Apixaban for periprocedural anticoagulation during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1691 patients.

Alessandro Blandino, Francesca Bianchi, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, Stefano Grossi, Maria Rosa Conte, Francesco Rametta, Fiorenzo Gaita

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Procedures on patients receiving NOACs : What's possible?]Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandro BlandinoDivision of Cardiology, S. Andrea Hospital, Corso Mario Abbiate 21, 13100, Vercelli, Italy. a.blandino@hotmail.com.
Francesca BianchiDivision of Cardiology, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Giuseppe Biondi-ZoccaiDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Latina, Italy.
Stefano GrossiDivision of Cardiology, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Maria Rosa ConteDivision of Cardiology, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Francesco RamettaDivision of Cardiology, S. Andrea Hospital, Corso Mario Abbiate 21, 13100, Vercelli, Italy.
Fiorenzo GaitaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
CTO Andrea Alesini · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeApixaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor recently approved for thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF), is increasingly used in patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF. However, large randomized studies supporting its use in the ablation context are still lacking. We undertook the present meta-analysis to assess the impact of apixaban in terms of thromboembolic and bleeding events in patients undergoing AF ablation as compared to warfarin.

methodsMEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and references reporting AF ablation and apixaban were screened and studies included if matching inclusion and exclusion criteria.

resultsOne randomized and five nonrandomized studies were included in the analysis. Patients enrolled were 1691 patients (668 on apixaban and 1023 on warfarin). There was no heterogeneity in all the outcome comparisons. No deaths were reported. We did not observe any difference between apixaban and warfarin with respect to thromboembolic events (OR = 1.10, 95 % CI 0.24-5.16), major bleedings (OR = 1.56, 95 % CI 0.59-4.13), cardiac tamponade (OR 1.69, 95 % CI 0.52-5.54), minor bleedings (OR 0.96, 95 % CI 0.58-1.59), and the composite endpoint of death, thromboembolic events, and bleedings (OR 1.03, 95 % CI 0.65-1.64).

conclusionsThe rates of death, thromboembolic events, major bleedings including cardiac tamponade, and minor bleedings in patients on apixaban undergoing AF ablation are very low and similar to that seen in patients treated with uninterrupted warfarin. Although primary driven by nonrandomized studies, these results support apixaban as periprocedural anticoagulation during AF ablation procedures.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAgedAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationCatheter AblationCausalityComorbidityFemaleFibrinolytic AgentsHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPremedicationPyrazolesAnticoagulantsapixabanFibrinolytic AgentsPyrazolesPyridonesApixabanAtrial fibrillationCatheter ablationMeta-analysisNovel oral anticoagulantsWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID27217030
OpenAlexW2397859786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.