Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27216918›Full record

ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2017

In vivo response to polypropylene following implantation in animal models: a review of biocompatibility.

Michelle Kelly, Katherine Macdougall, Oluwafisayo Olabisi, Neil McGuire

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International urogynecology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michelle KellyDevices Division, The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), 151 Buckingham Palace Road, London, SW1W 9SZ, UK.
Katherine MacdougallDevices Division, The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), 151 Buckingham Palace Road, London, SW1W 9SZ, UK.
Oluwafisayo OlabisiDevices Division, The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), 151 Buckingham Palace Road, London, SW1W 9SZ, UK. DSS-TM@mhra.gsi.gov.uk.
Neil McGuireDevices Division, The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), 151 Buckingham Palace Road, London, SW1W 9SZ, UK.
European Medicines Agency · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisPolypropylene is a material that is commonly used to treat pelvic floor conditions such as pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Owing to the nature of complications experienced by some patients implanted with either incontinence or prolapse meshes, the biocompatibility of polypropylene has recently been questioned. This literature review considers the in vivo response to polypropylene following implantation in animal models. The specific areas explored in this review are material selection, impact of anatomical location, and the structure, weight and size of polypropylene mesh types.

methodsAll relevant abstracts from original articles investigating the host response of mesh in vivo were reviewed. Papers were obtained and categorised into various mesh material types: polypropylene, polypropylene composites, and other synthetic and biologically derived mesh.

resultsPolypropylene mesh fared well in comparison with other material types in terms of host response. It was found that a lightweight, large-pore mesh is the most appropriate structure.

conclusionThe evidence reviewed shows that polypropylene evokes a less inflammatory or similar host response when compared with other materials used in mesh devices.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleForeign-Body ReactionHumansMaterials TestingPelvic Organ ProlapsePolypropylenesSurgical MeshUrinary Incontinence, StressBiocompatible MaterialsPolypropylenesBiocompatibilityHost responseMeshPelvic organ prolapsePolypropyleneStress urinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID27216918
PMCPMC5306078
OpenAlexW2407140755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.