Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27216805›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2016

Factors influencing adults' immunization practices: a pilot survey study of a diverse, urban community in central Ohio.

Alexa M Sevin, Cristina Romeo, Brittany Gagne, Nicole V Brown, Jennifer L Rodis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Results of Influenza Vaccination: Short Follow-Up Study of a Turkish Population.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Development of a Practice-based Community Outreach Intervention to Prevent Inequities in COVID-19 Vaccinations.American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexa M SevinPharmacy Practice and Science, The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy, 129C Parks Hall, 500W. 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Cristina RomeoBTG Plc, BESTMSLs , Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Brittany GagneKroger Pharmacy, Columbus, OH, USA.
Nicole V BrownCenter for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jennifer L RodisPharmacy Practice and Science, The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy, 129C Parks Hall, 500W. 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. rodis.2@osu.edu.
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdult vaccination rates in the United States are well below recommendations with disparities in race, ethnicity, and education level resulting in even lower rates for these populations. This study aimed to identify the barriers to and perceptions of immunizations in adults in an urban, underserved, multicultural community. Understanding the factors that influence adults' decisions to receive routinely recommended vaccines will aid health care providers and public health officials to design programs to improve vaccination rates.

methodsThis cross-sectional, survey-based study was conducted in January 2014 in Columbus, Ohio. Participants were recruited from four urban federally-qualified health centers and four grocery stores affiliated with those clinics. The survey gathered self-reported receipt of immunizations, knowledge about indications for immunizations, and factors influencing decisions to receive an immunization. Data was analyzed in 2014. Descriptive statistics were generated for all survey items and Chi-Square or Fisher's Exact tests were used as appropriate to test for associations between demographic characteristics and factors influencing immunization decisions.

resultsThe top five factors likely to affect the decision to receive an immunization among the 304 respondents were: "doctor's recommendation" (80.6 %), "knowing why I should get a vaccine" (78.2 %), "knowing which vaccines I need" (75.5 %), cost (54.2 %), and "concern about getting sick if I get a vaccine" (54.0 %). Significant differences in factors influencing the immunization decision exist among respondents based on ethnicity and education level. For those participants with self-identified diabetes, heart disease, or asthma, less than half were aware that certain immunizations could reduce the risk of complications associated with their disease(s).

conclusionsData from this study may inform and shape patient education programs conducted in clinics, retailers, and communities, as well as advocacy efforts for adult immunizations. Results from this study suggest that patients would respond to programs for promoting vaccine uptake if they focused on benefits and indications for vaccines. The results also highlighted the need for education regarding immunizations for patients with chronic diseases and special indications. The differences in perceptions found between groups can be used to create targeted interventions based on the needs of those patient populations.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEthnicityFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansImmunization ProgramsMaleMiddle AgedOhioPatient Acceptance of Health CarePerceptionPilot ProjectsPublic HealthVaccinesAdultsDisparitiesHealth behaviorImmunizationsPerceptionsSurvey

Identifiers

PMID27216805
PMCPMC4877755
OpenAlexW2397055153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.