Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27216517›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

Living on a flammable planet: interdisciplinary, cross-scalar and varied cultural lessons, prospects and challenges.

Christopher I Roos, Andrew C Scott, Claire M Belcher, William G Chaloner, Jonathan Aylen, Rebecca Bliege Bird, Michael R Coughlan, Bart R Johnson, Fay H Johnston, Julia McMorrow and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Tree rings reveal persistent Western Apache (Ndee) fire stewardship and niche construction in the American Southwest.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Priority research directions for wildfire science: views from a historically fire-prone and an emerging fire-prone country.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The contribution of Indigenous stewardship to an historical mixed-severity fire regime in British Columbia, Canada.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. African burned area and fire carbon emissions are strongly impacted by small fires undetected by coarse resolution satellite data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  9. Native American fire management at an ancient wildland-urban interface in the Southwest United States.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  10. Indigenous impacts on North American Great Plains fire regimes of the past millennium.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Wildfire policy and management in England: an evolving response from Fire and Rescue Services, forestry and cross-sector groups.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  13. The discovery of fire by humans: a long and convoluted process.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  14. The interaction of fire and mankind: Introduction.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  15. The role of fire in UK peatland and moorland management: the need for informed, unbiased debate.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christopher I RoosDepartment of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275, USA croos@smu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8754-7655
Andrew C ScottDepartment of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1998-3508
Claire M BelcherwildFIRE Lab, Hatherly Laboratories, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4PS, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3496-8290
William G ChalonerDepartment of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK.
Jonathan AylenManchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Rebecca Bliege BirdDepartment of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Michael R CoughlanDepartment of Anthropology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Bart R JohnsonDepartment of Landscape Architecture, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97401, USA.
Fay H JohnstonMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia.
Julia McMorrowSchool of Environment, Education, and Development, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1040-176X
Toddi SteelmanSchool of Environment and Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 5C8.
Fire and Mankind Discussion Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Living with fire is a challenge for human communities because they are influenced by socio-economic, political, ecological and climatic processes at various spatial and temporal scales. Over the course of 2 days, the authors discussed how communities could live with fire challenges at local, national and transnational scales. Exploiting our diverse, international and interdisciplinary expertise, we outline generalizable properties of fire-adaptive communities in varied settings where cultural knowledge of fire is rich and diverse. At the national scale, we discussed policy and management challenges for countries that have diminishing fire knowledge, but for whom global climate change will bring new fire problems. Finally, we assessed major fire challenges that transcend national political boundaries, including the health burden of smoke plumes and the climate consequences of wildfires. It is clear that to best address the broad range of fire problems, a holistic wildfire scholarship must develop common agreement in working terms and build across disciplines. We must also communicate our understanding of fire and its importance to the media, politicians and the general public.This article is part of the themed issue 'The interaction of fire and mankind'.

Indexed as

AttitudeClimate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesFiresEnvironmental HealthHumansPopulation Growthclimate changefire-adaptive communitiesfire managementsmoke and healthwildfire

Identifiers

PMID27216517
PMCPMC4874422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.