Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27216512›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

The role of fire in UK peatland and moorland management: the need for informed, unbiased debate.

G Matt Davies, Nicholas Kettridge, Cathelijne R Stoof, Alan Gray, Davide Ascoli, Paulo M Fernandes, Rob Marrs, Katherine A Allen, Stefan H Doerr, Gareth D Clay and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The use of fire to preserve biodiversity under novel fire regimes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Priority research directions for wildfire science: views from a historically fire-prone and an emerging fire-prone country.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Moorland vegetation burning debates should avoid contextomy and anachronism: a comment on Davies et al. (2016).Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  10. The role of fire in UK upland management: the need for informed challenge to conventional wisdoms: a comment on Davies et al. (2016).Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  11. The peatland vegetation burning debate: keep scientific critique in perspective. A response to Brown et al. and Douglas et al.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  12. At the nexus of fire, water and society.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  13. In the line of fire: the peatlands of Southeast Asia.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  14. Global trends in wildfire and its impacts: perceptions versus realities in a changing world.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  15. Wildfire policy and management in England: an evolving response from Fire and Rescue Services, forestry and cross-sector groups.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  16. Fire effects on soils: the human dimension.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  17. The discovery of fire by humans: a long and convoluted process.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  18. The interaction of fire and mankind: Introduction.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  19. Living on a flammable planet: interdisciplinary, cross-scalar and varied cultural lessons, prospects and challenges.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

G Matt DaviesSchool of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, Kottman Hall, 2021 Coffey Road, Columbus, OH 43210, USA davies.411@osu.edu.
Nicholas KettridgeSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B31 2DX, UK.
Cathelijne R StoofSoil Geography and Landscape Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 47, Wageningen 6700 AA, The Netherlands.
Alan GrayNERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Edinburgh EH26 0QB, UK.
Davide AscoliDepartment of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, Grugliasco (TO) 10095, Italy.
Paulo M FernandesCentro de Investigação e de Tecnologias Agro-Ambientais e Biológicas, Universidade de Tras-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal.
Rob MarrsSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GP, UK.
Katherine A AllenSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GP, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3270-5817
Stefan H DoerrDepartment of Geography, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8700-9002
Gareth D ClaySchool of Environment, Education and Development, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Julia McMorrowSchool of Environment, Education and Development, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Vigdis VandvikDepartment of Biology, University of Bergen, Postboks 7803, Bergen 5020, Norway.
University of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBSwansea University · GBThe Ohio State University · USUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology · GBUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro · PTUniversity of Turin · ITWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fire has been used for centuries to generate and manage some of the UK's cultural landscapes. Despite its complex role in the ecology of UK peatlands and moorlands, there has been a trend of simplifying the narrative around burning to present it as an only ecologically damaging practice. That fire modifies peatland characteristics at a range of scales is clearly understood. Whether these changes are perceived as positive or negative depends upon how trade-offs are made between ecosystem services and the spatial and temporal scales of concern. Here we explore the complex interactions and trade-offs in peatland fire management, evaluating the benefits and costs of managed fire as they are currently understood. We highlight the need for (i) distinguishing between the impacts of fires occurring with differing severity and frequency, and (ii) improved characterization of ecosystem health that incorporates the response and recovery of peatlands to fire. We also explore how recent research has been contextualized within both scientific publications and the wider media and how this can influence non-specialist perceptions. We emphasize the need for an informed, unbiased debate on fire as an ecological management tool that is separated from other aspects of moorland management and from political and economic opinions.This article is part of the themed issue 'The interaction of fire and mankind'.

Indexed as

FiresWetlandsConservation of Natural ResourcesUnited KingdomCalluna vulgarismanagement burningmoorlandpeatprescribed burningUKwildfire

Identifiers

PMID27216512
PMCPMC4874417
OpenAlexW2407476764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.