Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27216511›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

Wildfire policy and management in England: an evolving response from Fire and Rescue Services, forestry and cross-sector groups.

Rob Gazzard, Julia McMorrow, Jonathan Aylen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The discovery of fire by humans: a long and convoluted process.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  5. At the nexus of fire, water and society.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  6. Living on a flammable planet: interdisciplinary, cross-scalar and varied cultural lessons, prospects and challenges.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  7. The interaction of fire and mankind: Introduction.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rob GazzardForestry Commission England, Forest Services, Bucks Horn Oak, Farnham, Hampshire GU10 4LS, UK rob.gazzard@forestry.gsi.gov.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6350-6039
Julia McMorrowSchool of Environment, Education and Development, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Jonathan AylenManchester Institute of Innovation Research, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M017702/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe wildfires are an intermittent problem in England. The paper presents the first analysis of wildfire policy, showing its halting evolution over two decades. First efforts to coordinate wildfire management came from local fire operation groups, where stakeholders such as fire services, land owners and amenity groups shared knowledge and equipment to tackle the problem. A variety of structures and informal management solutions emerged in response to local needs. Knowledge of wildfire accumulated within regional and national wildfire forums and academic networks. Only later did the need for central emergency planning and the response to climate change produce a national policy response. Fire statistics have allowed wildfires to be spatially evidenced on a national scale only since 2009. National awareness of wildfire was spurred by the 2011 fire season, and the high-impact Swinley Forest fire, which threatened critical infrastructure and communities within 50 miles of London. Severe wildfire was included in the National Risk Register for the first time in 2013. Cross-sector approaches to wildfire proved difficult as government responsibility is fragmented along the hazard chain. Stakeholders such as the Forestry Commission pioneered good practice in adaptive land management to build fire resilience into UK forests. The grass-roots evolution of participatory solutions has also been a key enabling process. A coordinated policy is now needed to identify best practice and to promote understanding of the role of fire in the ecosystem.This article is part of a themed issue 'The interaction of fire and mankind'.

Indexed as

FiresForestsConservation of Natural ResourcesEnglandEnvironmental PolicyForestryadaptationemergency planningfire and rescue serviceforestryrural–urban interfacewildfire risk

Identifiers

PMID27216511
PMCPMC4874416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.