ArticleNeurosurgical review2017
Atypical pituitary adenomas: clinical characteristics and role of ki-67 and p53 in prognostic and therapeutic evaluation. A series of 50 patients.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ki67 in endocrine neoplasms: to count or not to count, this is the question! A systematic review from the English language literature.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2020Pooled it
- Role of Surgery in the Multimodal Treatment of Pituitary Carcinoma: A Retrospective Single-Institution Case Series.Cancers · 2026Article
- The Roles of PD-L1, Ki-67, P53, and Cyclin D1 in PitNETs: Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications in a Series of 74 Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Molecular targets in acromegaly.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Review
- Outcomes of transsphenoidal surgery in dopamine agonist-resistant prolactinomas: a retrospective study.Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2021Article
- The Past, Present, and Future Statuses of Formerly Classified "Atypical Pituitary Adenomas": A Clinicopathological Assessment of 101 Cases in a Cohort of More than 1,000 Pure Endoscopically Treated Patients in Single Center.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2021Article
- MicroRNAs expression in pituitary tumors: differences related to functional status, pathological features, and clinical behavior.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2020Article
- Are aggressive pituitary tumors and carcinomas two sides of the same coin? Pathologists reply to clinician's questions.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2020Review
- Clinicopathological analysis of 250 cases of pituitary adenoma under the new WHO classification.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- Review
- Pathology of prolactinomas: any predictive value?Pituitary · 2020Review
- Prolactinomas: Prognostic Factors of Early Remission After Transsphenoidal Surgery.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Article
- Prediction of high proliferative index in pituitary macroadenomas using MRI-based radiomics and machine learning.Neuroradiology · 2019Article
- Predictive modeling for pituitary adenomas: single center experience in 501 consecutive patients.Pituitary · 2019Article
- The Prognostic Roles of the Ki-67 Proliferation Index, P53 Expression, Mitotic Index, and Radiological Tumor Invasion in Pituitary Adenomas.Endocrine pathology · 2019Article
- Review
- Management of nonfunctioning pituitary tumors: radiotherapy.Pituitary · 2018Review
- Management of NFAs: medical treatment.Pituitary · 2018Review
- Malignant transformation in non-functioning pituitary adenomas (pituitary carcinoma).Pituitary · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to assess incidence rate, hormonal activity, and local invasiveness and evaluate outcomes of so-diagnosed atypical pituitary adenomas that underwent endoscopic endonasal surgery at the Division of Neurosurgery of Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II. According to the 2004 WHO classification, atypical pituitary adenomas are defined by an invasive growth, Ki-67/MIB-1 proliferative index greater than 3 %, high p53 immunoreactivity, and increased mitotic activity. A retrospective analysis of a series of 434 pituitary adenomas that underwent endoscopic endonasal surgery at our department between March 2007 and February 2013 was performed. Fifty adenomas (11.5 %) met the criteria of diagnosis of atypical lesions; 10 (21.6 %) of the 50 patients were recurrent tumors with a previous transsphenoidal surgery. Forty-one (82 %) were macroadenomas, and 21/50 (42 %) showed a clear invasion of the cavernous sinus. Histotype of atypical adenomas figured out to be nonfunctioning in 23 cases (46 %), PRL secreting in 10 cases (20 %), ACTH secreting and GH secreting each apart in 8 patients (16 %), and in a single case a GH/PRL secreting adenoma (2 %). The Ki-67 labeling index ranged from 3.5 to 22.5 % (mean 5.6 %). Tumor recurrence was observed in six cases (12 %) after a mean time of 18 months (range 9-24 months). Mean follow-up was 36.5 months (range 2-80 months). Atypical pituitary adenomas account for ca. 10 % of all pituitary adenomas; these lesions have peculiar features. It should be considered that a strong immunopositivity of p53 and higher Ki-67 LI could predict an increased risk of tumor recurrence, but more studies and larger series are expected to confirm and enlarge the diagnostic and therapeutic management process of these lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.