ArticleBMC plant biology2016
Transcriptomic network analyses of leaf dehydration responses identify highly connected ABA and ethylene signaling hubs in three grapevine species differing in drought tolerance.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Abscisic acid interplay with phytohormones, plant growth regulators and signaling molecules in orchestrating an elaborate crosstalk for stress resilience in plants.Biologia futura · 2026Review
- Combined omics data reveal multilevel response to water deficit in grapevine disease-resistant varieties.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- SlALKBH9B is involved in drought-induced flower drop by regulating ethylene production.Horticulture research · 2025Article
- Metabolomic and Transcriptomic Analyses Reveal Changes in Active Components During the Growth and Development of Comfrey (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Gene Co-expression Network Analysis of the Comparative Transcriptome Identifies Hub Genes Associated With Resistance toFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Vitis OneGenE: A Causality-Based Approach to Generate Gene Networks inBiomolecules · 2021Article
- Comparative transcriptome analyses between cultivated and wild grapes reveal conservation of expressed genes but extensive rewiring of co-expression networks.Plant molecular biology · 2021Article
- Gene co-expression network analysis of the heat-responsive core transcriptome identifies hub genes in Brassica rapa.Planta · 2021Article
- Dynamic changes of transcriptome of fifth-instar3 Biotech · 2021Article
- Comparative Phenotypic and Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Key Responses of Upland Cotton to Salinity Stress During Postgermination.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Molecular Tools for Adapting Viticulture to Climate Change.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- Transcriptional analysis reveals sodium nitroprusside affects alfalfa in response to PEG-induced osmotic stress at germination stage.Protoplasma · 2020Article
- VviERF6Ls: an expanded clade in Vitis responds transcriptionally to abiotic and biotic stresses and berry development.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Trapped in the Rhizosheath: Root-Bacterial Interactions Modulate Ethylene Signaling.Plant physiology · 2020Article
- Drought tolerance of the grapevine, Vitis champinii cv. Ramsey, is associated with higher photosynthesis and greater transcriptomic responsiveness of abscisic acid biosynthesis and signaling.BMC plant biology · 2020Article
- A sense of place: transcriptomics identifies environmental signatures in Cabernet Sauvignon berry skins in the late stages of ripening.BMC plant biology · 2020Article
- Integration of Metabolite Profiling and Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Genes Related to Volatile Terpenoid Metabolism in Finger Citron (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Dynamic Transcriptome Changes Related to Oil Accumulation in Developing Soybean Seeds.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Iso-Seq Allows Genome-Independent Transcriptome Profiling of Grape Berry Development.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Transcriptomic response is more sensitive to water deficit in shoots than roots of Vitis riparia (Michx.).BMC plant biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGrapevine is a major food crop that is affected by global climate change. Consistent with field studies, dehydration assays of grapevine leaves can reveal valuable information of the plant's response at physiological, transcript, and protein levels. There are well-known differences in grapevine rootstocks responses to dehydration. We used time-series transcriptomic approaches combined with network analyses to elucidate and identify important physiological processes and network hubs that responded to dehydration in three different grapevine species differing in their drought tolerance.
resultsTranscriptomic analyses of the leaves of Cabernet Sauvignon, Riparia Gloire, and Ramsey were evaluated at different times during a 24-h controlled dehydration. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that approximately 11,000 transcripts changed significantly with respect to the genotype x treatment interaction term and approximately 6000 transcripts changed significantly according to the genotype x treatment x time interaction term indicating massive differential changes in gene expression over time. Standard analyses determined substantial effects on the transcript abundance of genes involved in the metabolism and signaling of two known plant stress hormones, abscisic acid (ABA) and ethylene. ABA and ethylene signaling maps were constructed and revealed specific changes in transcript abundance that were associated with the known drought tolerance of the genotypes including genes such as VviABI5, VviABF2, VviACS2, and VviWRKY22. Weighted-gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) confirmed these results. In particular, WGCNA identified 30 different modules, some of which had highly enriched gene ontology (GO) categories for photosynthesis, phenylpropanoid metabolism, ABA and ethylene signaling. The ABA signaling transcription factors, VviABI5 and VviABF2, were highly connected hubs in two modules, one being enriched in gaseous transport and the other in ethylene signaling. VviABI5 was distinctly correlated with an early response and high expression for the drought tolerant Ramsey and with little response from the drought sensitive Riparia Gloire. These ABA signaling transcription factors were highly connected to VviSnRK1 and other gene hubs associated with sugar, ethylene and ABA signaling.
conclusionA leaf dehydration assay provided transcriptomic evidence for differential leaf responses to dehydration between genotypes differing in their drought tolerance. WGCNA proved to be a powerful network analysis approach; it identified 30 distinct modules (networks) with highly enriched GO categories and enabled the identification of gene hubs in these modules. Some of these genes were highly connected hubs in both the ABA and ethylene signaling pathways, supporting the hypothesis that there is substantial crosstalk between the two hormone pathways. This study identifies solid gene candidates for future investigations of drought tolerance in grapevine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.