Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27215595›Full record

SynthesisDeutsches Arzteblatt international2016

The Pharmacological Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Adrian Gillissen, Peter Haidl, Martin Khlhäufl, Klaus Kroegel, Thomas Voshaar, Christian Gessner

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Maintenance therapy in COPD: time to phase out ICS and switch to the new LAMA/LABA inhalers?International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2017
    Review
  9. A Belgian survey on the diagnosis of asthma-COPD overlap syndrome.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2017
    Article
  10. Missing Information.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016
    Article
  11. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adrian GillissenDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Kassel General Hospital, Fachkrankenhaus Kloster Grafschaft, Schmallenberg, Klinik Schillerhöhe, Stuttgart, Department of Internal Medicine I: Pneumology & Allergology/Immunology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Department of Pneumology and Allergy, Medical Clinic III, Bethanien Hospital Moers, Department of Pneumology, University of Leipzig.
Peter Haidl
Martin Khlhäufl
Klaus Kroegel
Thomas Voshaar
Christian Gessner
Friedrich Schiller University Jena · DEKlinikum Kassel · DELeipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are markedly less effective against chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) than against asthma, and also have worse side effects. Whether ICS should be used to treat COPD is currently a matter of debate.

methodsThis review is based on pertinent articles retrieved by a selective search in PubMed and the Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) carried out in May 2015. We analyzed clinical trials of ICS for the treatment of COPD with a duration of at least one year, along with meta-analyses and COPD guidelines.

resultsICS lower the frequency and severity of COPD exacerbations in comparison to monotherapy with a long-acting ß2-agonist, but have no effect on mortality. Compared to placebo, ICS monotherapy lessens the decline of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) over one year by merely 5.80 mL (statistically insignificant; 95% confidence interval: [-0.28; 11.88]) and only marginally improve quality of life. ICS use in patients with COPD increases the risk of pneumonia. A combination of ICS with a long-acting bronchodilator improves FEV1 by 133 mL [105; 161] and lowers the frequency of severe exacerbations by 39% . The frequency of exacerbations is lowered mainly in patients who have many exacerbations; thus, ICS treatment is suitable only for patients with grade III or IV COPD.

conclusionICS monotherapy has no clinically useful effect on pulmonary function in COPD. The main form of drug treatment for COPD is with broncho - dilators, either alone or in combination with ICS. ICS can be given to patients with grade III or IV COPD to make exacerbations less frequent. Patients with an asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) can benefit from ICS treatment.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdolescentAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBronchodilator AgentsComorbidityEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPneumoniaPrevalencePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdrenal Cortex HormonesBronchodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID27215595
PMCPMC4961886
OpenAlexW2399137659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.