ReviewNature reviews. Urology2016
Advances in laparoscopic surgery in urology.
Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Towards 3D-dense ultrasound image simulation from 2D CT scans for ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a progressive training approach from basic to advanced simulator complexity.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Feasibility and Safety Study of the Use of a New Robot (Maestro™) for Laparoscopic Surgery.Obesity surgery · 2024Article
- Advances of surgical robotics: image-guided classification and application.National science review · 2024Review
- Feeling of pulsations in artificial arteries with a real time haptic feedback laparoscopic grasper: a validation study.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of GoPro and digital cameras in head and neck flap harvesting surgery video documentation: an innovative and efficient method for surgical education.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Confronting new challenges: Faculty perceptions of gaps in current laparoscopic curricula in a changing training landscape.Surgery open science · 2023Article
- Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (Health-ITUES) and User-Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) for 3D Intraoperative Cognitive Navigation (ICON3DMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Fabrication and application of a wireless high-definition endoscopic system in urological surgeries.BJU international · 2023Article
- Robotic-assisted surgery in the pediatric surgeons' world: Current situation and future prospectives.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Review
- Management with Santorini's Plexus Should Be Personalized during Prostatectomy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Advances in Assistive Electronic Device Solutions for Urology.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Utility of total cell-free DNA levels for surgical damage evaluation in patients with urological surgeries.Scientific reports · 2021Observational
- Single-port robot assisted concomitant hemi-nephrectomy, ureterectomy and radical prostatectomy using the da vinci SP platform.Urology case reports · 2021Article
- Comparing Oncological Outcomes and Surgical Complications of Hand-Assisted, Laparoscopic and Robotic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy: The state of art.Asian journal of urology · 2021Review
- Robot-assisted endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: A review of current outcomes.Asian journal of urology · 2021Review
- Robotic surgical systems in urology: What is currently available?Investigative and clinical urology · 2021Review
- High-Definition Zoom Mode, a High-Resolution X-Ray Microscope for Neurointerventional Treatment Procedures: A Blinded-Rater Clinical-Utility Study.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2019Article
- Article
- The Future of Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Urology: Upcoming Technology and Evolution Within the Field.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the past 10 years, laparoscopy has been challenged by robotic surgery; nevertheless, laparoscopic techniques are subject to continuous change. Ultrahigh definition is the next development in video technology, it delivers fourfold more detail than full high definition resulting in improved fine detail, increased texture, and an almost photographic emulsion of smoothness of the image. New 4K ultrahigh-definition technology might remove the current need for the use of polarized glasses. New devices for laparoscopy include advanced sealing devices, instruments with six degrees of freedom, ergonomic platforms with armrests and a chest support, and camera holders. A manually manipulated robot-like device is still at the experimental stage. Robot-assisted surgery has substantially revolutionized laparoscopy, increasing its distribution; however, robot-assisted surgery is associated with considerable costs. All technical improvements of laparoscopic surgery are extremely valuable to further simplify the use of classical laparoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.