ArticlePloS one2016
Robust Machine Learning-Based Correction on Automatic Segmentation of the Cerebellum and Brainstem.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Open-Label Allopregnanolone Treatment of Men with Fragile X-Associated Tremor/Ataxia Syndrome.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2017Trial
- Longitudinal Analysis of Neuroradiological Biomarkers for Fragile X-Associated Tremor/Ataxia Syndrome and Implications for Clinical Trials.Annals of neurology · 2025Article
- Analysis of GFAP variants in UK Biobank suggests underdiagnosis or incomplete penetrance of adult-onset Alexander disease.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2025Article
- Cerebellar Structural and N-Acetylaspartate, Choline, and Creatine Metabolic Profiles in Parkinson's Disease and Essential Tremor.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Clinical and Molecular Correlates of Abnormal Changes in the Cerebellum and Globus Pallidus in Fragile X Premutation.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- A structural connectivity atlas of limbic brainstem nuclei.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2022Article
- Replicability, Repeatability, and Long-term Reproducibility of Cerebellar Morphometry.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2021Article
- Fragile X Premutation: Medications, Therapy and Lifestyle Advice.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2021Review
- Developmental aspects of FXAND in a man with the FMR1 premutation.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2020Article
- Interaction between ventricular expansion and structural changes in the corpus callosum and putamen in males with FMR1 normal and premutation alleles.Neurobiology of aging · 2020Article
- Accurate, rapid and reliable, fully automated MRI brainstem segmentation for application in multiple sclerosis and neurodegenerative diseases.Human brain mapping · 2019Article
- Using Virtual Reality to Improve Performance and User Experience in Manual Correction of MRI Segmentation Errors by Non-experts.Journal of digital imaging · 2019Article
- An efficient and accurate method for robust inter-dataset brain extraction and comparisons with 9 other methods.Human brain mapping · 2018Article
- Cerebellum and neurodegenerative diseases: Beyond conventional magnetic resonance imaging.World journal of radiology · 2017Review
- Cerebellar anatomical alterations and attention to eyes in autism.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Abnormal trajectories in cerebellum and brainstem volumes in carriers of the fragile X premutation.Neurobiology of aging · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Automated segmentation is a useful method for studying large brain structures such as the cerebellum and brainstem. However, automated segmentation may lead to inaccuracy and/or undesirable boundary. The goal of the present study was to investigate whether SegAdapter, a machine learning-based method, is useful for automatically correcting large segmentation errors and disagreement in anatomical definition. We further assessed the robustness of the method in handling size of training set, differences in head coil usage, and amount of brain atrophy. High resolution T1-weighted images were acquired from 30 healthy controls scanned with either an 8-channel or 32-channel head coil. Ten patients, who suffered from brain atrophy because of fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome, were scanned using the 32-channel head coil. The initial segmentations of the cerebellum and brainstem were generated automatically using Freesurfer. Subsequently, Freesurfer's segmentations were both manually corrected to serve as the gold standard and automatically corrected by SegAdapter. Using only 5 scans in the training set, spatial overlap with manual segmentation in Dice coefficient improved significantly from 0.956 (for Freesurfer segmentation) to 0.978 (for SegAdapter-corrected segmentation) for the cerebellum and from 0.821 to 0.954 for the brainstem. Reducing the training set size to 2 scans only decreased the Dice coefficient ≤0.002 for the cerebellum and ≤ 0.005 for the brainstem compared to the use of training set size of 5 scans in corrective learning. The method was also robust in handling differences between the training set and the test set in head coil usage and the amount of brain atrophy, which reduced spatial overlap only by <0.01. These results suggest that the combination of automated segmentation and corrective learning provides a valuable method for accurate and efficient segmentation of the cerebellum and brainstem, particularly in large-scale neuroimaging studies, and potentially for segmenting other neural regions as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.