Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27213613›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

The Lancet Weight Determines Wheal Diameter in Response to Skin Prick Testing with Histamine.

Hjalte H Andersen, Anna Charlotte Lundgaard, Anne S Petersen, Lise E Hauberg, Neha Sharma, Sofie D Hansen, Jesper Elberling, Lars Arendt-Nielsen

Open access · goldAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Medical devices in allergy practice.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2020
    Review
  6. Epinephrine auto-injector needle length: The impact of winter clothing.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hjalte H AndersenSMI®, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Anna Charlotte LundgaardSMI®, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Anne S PetersenSMI®, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Lise E HaubergSMI®, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Neha SharmaSMI®, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Sofie D HansenSMI®, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Jesper ElberlingThe Allergy Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars Arendt-NielsenSMI®, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Aalborg University · DKGentofte Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkin prick test (SPT) is a common test for diagnosing immunoglobulin E-mediated allergies. In clinical routine, technicalities, human errors or patient-related biases, occasionally results in suboptimal diagnosis of sensitization.

objectiveAlthough not previously assessed qualitatively, lancet weight is hypothesized to be important when performing SPT to minimize the frequency of false positives, false negatives, and unwanted discomfort.

methodsAccurate weight-controlled SPT was performed on the volar forearms and backs of 20 healthy subjects. Four predetermined lancet weights were applied (25 g, 85 g, 135 g and 265 g) using two positive control histamine solutions (1 mg/mL and 10 mg/mL) and one negative control (saline). A total of 400 SPTs were conducted. The outcome parameters were: wheal size, neurogenic inflammation (measured by superficial blood perfusion), frequency of bleeding, and the lancet provoked pain response.

resultsThe mean wheal diameter increased significantly as higher weights were applied to the SPT lancet, e.g. from 3.2 ± 0.28 mm at 25 g to 5.4 ± 1.7 mm at 265 g (p<0.01). Similarly, the frequency of bleeding, the provoked pain, and the neurogenic inflammatory response increased significantly. At 265 g saline evoked two wheal responses (/160 pricks) below 3 mm. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The applied weight of the lancet during the SPT-procedure is an important factor. Higher lancet weights precipitate significantly larger wheal reactions with potential diagnostic implications. This warrants additional research of the optimal lancet weight in relation to SPT-guidelines to improve the specificity and sensitivity of the procedure.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleForearmHistamineHumansHypersensitivity, ImmediateImmunoglobulin EMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificitySkin TestsUrticariaYoung AdultHistamineImmunoglobulin E

Identifiers

PMID27213613
PMCPMC4877047
OpenAlexW2404945632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.