Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27213423›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2016

Geographic Clustering of Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Metropolitan Centres in France and Australia.

Catherine Paquet, Basile Chaix, Natasha J Howard, Neil T Coffee, Robert J Adams, Anne W Taylor, Frédérique Thomas, Mark Daniel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spatial Co-Clustering of Cardiovascular Diseases and Select Risk Factors among Adults in South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Catherine PaquetCentre for Population Health Research, School of Health Sciences, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia. catherine.paquet@unisa.edu.au.
Basile ChaixInserm, UMR-S 1136, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, Nemesis Team, Paris 75012, France. basile.chaix@iplesp.upmc.fr.
Natasha J HowardCentre for Population Health Research, School of Health Sciences, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia. natasha.howard@unisa.edu.au.
Neil T CoffeeCentre for Population Health Research, School of Health Sciences, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia. neil.coffee@unisa.edu.au.
Robert J AdamsDiscipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia. robert.adams@adelaide.edu.au.
Anne W TaylorDiscipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia. anne.taylor@adelaide.edu.au.
Frédérique ThomasCentre d'Investigations Préventives et Cliniques, Paris 75116, France. Thomas@ipc.asso.fr.
Mark DanielCentre for Population Health Research, School of Health Sciences, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia. mark.daniel@unisa.edu.au.
University of South Australia · AUThe University of Adelaide · AUInserm · FRThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how health outcomes are spatially distributed represents a first step in investigating the scale and nature of environmental influences on health and has important implications for statistical power and analytic efficiency. Using Australian and French cohort data, this study aimed to describe and compare the extent of geographic variation, and the implications for analytic efficiency, across geographic units, countries and a range of cardiometabolic parameters (Body Mass Index (BMI) waist circumference, blood pressure, resting heart rate, triglycerides, cholesterol, glucose, HbA1c). Geographic clustering was assessed using Intra-Class Correlation (ICC) coefficients in biomedical cohorts from Adelaide (Australia, n = 3893) and Paris (France, n = 6430) for eight geographic administrative units. The median ICC was 0.01 suggesting 1% of risk factor variance attributable to variation between geographic units. Clustering differed by cardiometabolic parameters, administrative units and countries and was greatest for BMI and resting heart rate in the French sample, HbA1c in the Australian sample, and for smaller geographic units. Analytic inefficiency due to clustering was greatest for geographic units in which participants were nested in fewer, larger geographic units. Differences observed in geographic clustering across risk factors have implications for choice of geographic unit in sampling and analysis, and highlight potential cross-country differences in the distribution, or role, of environmental features related to cardiometabolic health.

Indexed as

Geographic MappingBiomarkersBlood GlucoseBlood PressureBody Mass IndexCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, HDLCluster AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth SurveysHumansInsulin ResistanceMaleMetabolic SyndromeBiomarkersBlood GlucoseCholesterol, HDLTriglyceridescardiometabolic risk factorscross-country comparisongeographic clusteringgeographic variationIntra-Class Correlation

Identifiers

PMID27213423
PMCPMC4881144
OpenAlexW2403123379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.