Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27213279›Full record

ArticleArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2016

Brief Report: Risk of Gastrointestinal Perforation Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Receiving Tofacitinib, Tocilizumab, or Other Biologic Treatments.

Fenglong Xie, Huifeng Yun, Sasha Bernatsky, Jeffrey R Curtis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Treg-specific IL-6R signaling: a novel role in the regulation of the intestinal epithelium.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fenglong XieUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Huifeng YunUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Sasha BernatskyMcGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jeffrey R CurtisUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham. jcurtis@uab.edu.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USMcGill University · CA

Funding

UAB Multidisciplinary Clinical Research CenterP60AR064172 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BRIDGES, S LOUIS · 2013 to 2018
$4.5M
CIHRNIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR064172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate gastrointestinal (GI) perforation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving tofacitinib, tocilizumab, or other biologic agents.

methodsUsing health plan data from 2006 through 2014, RA patients without prior GI perforation were identified. Those in whom treatment with tofacitinib or a biologic agent was being initiated were followed up for incident GI perforation with hospitalization. Crude incidence rates were calculated by exposure. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between GI perforation and exposures. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated.

resultsA cohort of 167,113 RA patients was analyzed. Among them, 4,755 began treatment with tofacitinib, 11,705 with tocilizumab, 115,047 with a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), 31,214 with abatacept, and 4,392 with rituximab. Compared to TNFi recipients, abatacept recipients were older, tofacitinib and rituximab recipients were younger, and tocilizumab recipients were similar in age. Patients beginning treatment with a non-TNFi agent were more likely to have previously received biologic agents than patients beginning treatment with a TNFi. The incidence of GI perforation per 1,000 patient-years was 0.86 (tofacitinib), 1.55 (tocilizumab), 1.07 (abatacept), 0.73 (rituximab), and 0.83 (TNFi). Most perforations occurred in the lower GI tract: the incidence of lower GI tract perforation per 1,000 patient-years was 0.86 (tofacitinib), 1.26 (tocilizumab), 0.76 (abatacept), 0.48 (rituximab), and 0.46 (TNFi). Lower GI tract perforation risk was significantly elevated with tocilizumab treatment, and numerically elevated with tofacitinib treatment, versus treatment with TNFi. Adjusted HRs were 2.51 (95% CI 1.31-4.80) for tocilizumab and 1.94 (95% CI 0.49-7.65) for tofacitinib. Older age (HR 1.16 per 5 years [95% CI 1.10-1.22]), diverticulitis/other GI conditions (HR 3.25 [95% CI 1.62-6.50]), and prednisone use at >7.5 mg/day (HR 2.29 [95% CI 1.39-3.78]) were associated with lower GI tract perforation. The incidence of upper GI tract perforation was similar among all drug exposures.

conclusionThe risk of lower GI tract perforation associated with tocilizumab treatment, and possibly tofacitinib treatment, is elevated compared to that associated with TNF blockade.

Indexed as

AbataceptAdultAgedAge FactorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsDatabases, FactualDiverticulitisEsophageal PerforationFemaleGastroesophageal RefluxGlucocorticoidsHumansIncidenceAbataceptAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsGlucocorticoidsPiperidinesPrednisonePyrimidinesPyrrolesRituximabtocilizumabtofacitinibTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID27213279
PMCPMC5538140
OpenAlexW2543549509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.