Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27213271›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

A Dynamic 3D Graphical Representation for RNA Structure Analysis and Its Application in Non-Coding RNA Classification.

Yi Zhang, Haiyun Huang, Xiaoqing Dong, Yiliang Fang, Kejing Wang, Lijuan Zhu, Ke Wang, Tao Huang, Jialiang Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. MicroRNA prediction based on 3D graphical representation of RNA secondary structures.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yi ZhangDepartment of Mathematics, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050018, People's Republic of China.
Haiyun HuangDepartment of Information Retrieval of Library, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050018, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoqing DongDepartment of Mathematics, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050018, People's Republic of China.
Yiliang FangInternational Travel Healthcare Center, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, People's Republic of China.
Kejing WangDepartment of Mathematics, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050018, People's Republic of China.
Lijuan ZhuDepartment of Mathematics, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050018, People's Republic of China.
Ke WangDepartment of Mathematics, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050018, People's Republic of China.
Tao HuangInstitute of Health Sciences, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, People's Republic of China.
Jialiang YangDepartment of Mathematics, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050018, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-4689-8672

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the development of new technologies in transcriptome and epigenetics, RNAs have been identified to play more and more important roles in life processes. Consequently, various methods have been proposed to assess the biological functions of RNAs and thus classify them functionally, among which comparative study of RNA structures is perhaps the most important one. To measure the structural similarity of RNAs and classify them, we propose a novel three dimensional (3D) graphical representation of RNA secondary structure, in which an RNA secondary structure is first transformed into a characteristic sequence based on chemical property of nucleic acids; a dynamic 3D graph is then constructed for the characteristic sequence; and lastly a numerical characterization of the 3D graph is used to represent the RNA secondary structure. We tested our algorithm on three datasets: (1) Dataset I consisting of nine RNA secondary structures of viruses, (2) Dataset II consisting of complex RNA secondary structures including pseudo-knots, and (3) Dataset III consisting of 18 non-coding RNA families. We also compare our method with other nine existing methods using Dataset II and III. The results demonstrate that our method is better than other methods in similarity measurement and classification of RNA secondary structures.

Indexed as

Computer GraphicsNucleic Acid ConformationBase SequencePhylogenyRNA, UntranslatedRNA, ViralRNA, UntranslatedRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID27213271
PMCPMC4877074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.