Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27213017›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2016

SePIA: RNA and small RNA sequence processing, integration, and analysis.

Katherine Icay, Ping Chen, Alejandra Cervera, Ville Rantanen, Rainer Lehtonen, Sampsa Hautaniemi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine Icay *Research Programs Unit, Genome-Scale Biology, Medicum and Department of Biochemistry and Developmental Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, POB 63, Helsinki, 00014 Finland.
Ping Chen *Research Programs Unit, Genome-Scale Biology, Medicum and Department of Biochemistry and Developmental Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, POB 63, Helsinki, 00014 Finland.
Alejandra Cervera *Research Programs Unit, Genome-Scale Biology, Medicum and Department of Biochemistry and Developmental Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, POB 63, Helsinki, 00014 Finland.
Ville RantanenResearch Programs Unit, Genome-Scale Biology, Medicum and Department of Biochemistry and Developmental Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, POB 63, Helsinki, 00014 Finland.
Rainer LehtonenResearch Programs Unit, Genome-Scale Biology, Medicum and Department of Biochemistry and Developmental Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, POB 63, Helsinki, 00014 Finland.
Sampsa HautaniemiResearch Programs Unit, Genome-Scale Biology, Medicum and Department of Biochemistry and Developmental Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, POB 63, Helsinki, 00014 Finland.
University of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge-scale sequencing experiments are complex and require a wide spectrum of computational tools to extract and interpret relevant biological information. This is especially true in projects where individual processing and integrated analysis of both small RNA and complementary RNA data is needed. Such studies would benefit from a computational workflow that is easy to implement and standardizes the processing and analysis of both sequenced data types.

resultsWe developed SePIA (Sequence Processing, Integration, and Analysis), a comprehensive small RNA and RNA workflow. It provides ready execution for over 20 commonly known RNA-seq tools on top of an established workflow engine and provides dynamic pipeline architecture to manage, individually analyze, and integrate both small RNA and RNA data. Implementation with Docker makes SePIA portable and easy to run. We demonstrate the workflow's extensive utility with two case studies involving three breast cancer datasets. SePIA is straightforward to configure and organizes results into a perusable HTML report. Furthermore, the underlying pipeline engine supports computational resource management for optimal performance.

conclusionSePIA is an open-source workflow introducing standardized processing and analysis of RNA and small RNA data. SePIA's modular design enables robust customization to a given experiment while maintaining overall workflow structure. It is available at http://anduril.org/sepia.

Indexed as

Breast cancerIntegrationmiRNARNASequencingtotalRNA

Identifiers

PMID27213017
PMCPMC4875694
OpenAlexW2398060177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.