ArticleCanadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC2016
Economic analysis of insulin initiation by pharmacists in a Canadian setting: The RxING study.
Article in Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perspectives of future pharmacists on the potential for development and implementation of pharmacist prescribing in Qatar.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2020Article
- A scoping review of research on the prescribing practice of Canadian pharmacists.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConducted in Alberta, the RxING study examined the effect of a community pharmacist prescribing intervention on glycemic control in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using insulin glargine. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of pharmacists' prescribing of insulin glargine as an early intervention in uncontrolled patients with T2DM vs usual clinical practice.
methodsThe IMS CORE diabetes Markov model was used to project long-term clinical outcomes, costs and cost-effectiveness of interventions. The efficacy of insulin glargine, in terms of hemoglobin A1c reduction and hypoglycemia rates, was obtained from the RxING study. Health utility and cost data were found in Canadian publications. The base-case analyses examined the economic and clinical effects of having pharmacists initiate insulin therapy in patients with uncontrolled T2DM in comparison to a physician initiate it up to 3 years later.
resultsInsulin initiation by pharmacists with uncontrolled T2DM patients is cost-effective. Having pharmacists prescribe insulin 1 year earlier than usual clinical practice resulted in an incremental cost savings of $805 (CDN$) and a gain of 0.048 QALYs per patient. Pharmacists prescribing insulin 2 years earlier resulted in an incremental cost savings of $624 (CDN$) per year and a gain of 0.075 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Prescribing 3 years earlier allowed for a minor increase of $26 and a gain of 0.086 QALYs.
conclusionEarlier initiation of insulin by pharmacists, in uncontrolled T2DM patients, resulted in cost savings and delays in the development of diabetes-related complications, leading to an improved quality of life and increased survival rates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.