Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27212228›Full record

Trial reportExpert review of vaccines2016

Influenza vaccination of pregnant women protects them over two consecutive influenza seasons in a randomized controlled trial.

Eleonora Mutsaerts, Shabir A Madhi, Clare L Cutland, Stephanie Jones, Andrea Hugo, Siobhan Trenor, Florette K Treurnicht, Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch, Adriana Weinberg, Marta C Nunes

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Expert review of vaccines, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Travellers and influenza: risks and prevention.Journal of travel medicine · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Eleonora Mutsaertsa Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Vaccine Preventable Diseases , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa.
Shabir A Madhia Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Vaccine Preventable Diseases , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa.
Clare L Cutlanda Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Vaccine Preventable Diseases , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa.
Stephanie Jonesa Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Vaccine Preventable Diseases , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa.
Andrea Hugoa Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Vaccine Preventable Diseases , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa.
Siobhan Trenora Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Vaccine Preventable Diseases , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa.
Florette K Treurnichtd National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Division of National Health Laboratory Service , Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis , Johannesburg , South Africa.
Kerstin Klipstein-Grobuschc Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care , University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht , The Netherlands.
Adriana Weinbergf Department of Pediatrics, Medicine and Pathology , University of Colorado , Aurora , CO , USA.
Marta C Nunesa Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Vaccine Preventable Diseases , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa.
Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit · ZAUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZANational Health Laboratory Service · ZANational Research Foundation · ZAUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe assessed the persistence of hemagglutinin inhibition (HAI) antibodies and the vaccine efficacy (VE) of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) following vaccination of a cohort of pregnant South African women during a second influenza season.

methodsA cohort of women who participated in a randomized placebo-controlled trial on the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of IIV3 in 2011 had HAI titers measured in 2012 and were monitored for influenza illness until the end of 2012.

resultsThe proportion of women with HAI titers ≥1:40 was significantly greater in vaccinees (63%) compared to placebo-recipients (22%; p < 0.001). VE in 2012 was 63.8% (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: -33.7%, 90.2%); combined VE for 2011 and 2012 was 58.3% (95%CI: 0.2%, 82.6%).

conclusionThe majority of women who received IIV3 during pregnancy had HAI titers above the putative threshold for protection against influenza illness one year after vaccination and showed a trend towards protection against influenza disease.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, ViralFemaleHemagglutination Inhibition TestsHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesPlacebosPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousSouth AfricaTreatment OutcomeVaccines, InactivatedYoung AdultAntibodies, ViralHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusInfluenza VaccinesPlacebosVaccines, InactivatedefficacyimmunogenicityInfluenza vaccinematernal immunization

Identifiers

PMID27212228
PMCPMC4950453
OpenAlexW2405223853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.