Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27212196›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2016

Robust Intratumor Partitioning to Identify High-Risk Subregions in Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study.

Jia Wu, Michael F Gensheimer, Xinzhe Dong, Daniel L Rubin, Sandy Napel, Maximilian Diehn, Billy W Loo, Ruijiang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. BMC cancer · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Using tumor habitat-derived radiomic analysis during pretreatmentCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  15. Subregion-specificAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Application of radiomics in lung immuno-oncology.Precision radiation oncology · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jia WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Michael F GensheimerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Xinzhe DongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Daniel L RubinDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics Research), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Sandy NapelDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Maximilian DiehnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Billy W LooDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Ruijiang LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Electronic address: rli2@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Qualification and Deployment of Imaging Biomarkers of Cancer Treatment ResponseU01CA190214 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2015 to 2020
$3.1M
Tools for Linking and Mining image and Genomic Data in Non-Small Cell Lung CancerR01CA160251 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NAPEL, SANDY A., PLEVRITIS, SYLVIA KATINA · 2011 to 2015
$2.9M
Computing, Optimizing, and Evaluating Quantitative Cancer Imaging BiomarkersU01CA187947 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NAPEL, SANDY A., RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
MRI-Based Radiation Therapy Treatment PlanningR01CA193730 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LI, RUIJIANG · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
Real-Time Volumetric Imaging for Lung Cancer RadiotherapyR00CA166186 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LI, RUIJIANG · 2014 to 2016
$719k
NCI NIH HHS R00 CA166186NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160251NCI NIH HHS R01 CA193730NCI NIH HHS U01 CA187947NCI NIH HHS U01 CA190214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop an intratumor partitioning framework for identifying high-risk subregions from (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and computed tomography (CT) imaging and to test whether tumor burden associated with the high-risk subregions is prognostic of outcomes in lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this institutional review board-approved retrospective study, we analyzed the pretreatment FDG-PET and CT scans of 44 lung cancer patients treated with radiation therapy. A novel, intratumor partitioning method was developed, based on a 2-stage clustering process: first at the patient level, each tumor was over-segmented into many superpixels by k-means clustering of integrated PET and CT images; next, tumor subregions were identified by merging previously defined superpixels via population-level hierarchical clustering. The volume associated with each of the subregions was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis regarding its prognostic capability in predicting overall survival (OS) and out-of-field progression (OFP).

resultsThree spatially distinct subregions were identified within each tumor that were highly robust to uncertainty in PET/CT co-registration. Among these, the volume of the most metabolically active and metabolically heterogeneous solid component of the tumor was predictive of OS and OFP on the entire cohort, with a concordance index or CI of 0.66-0.67. When restricting the analysis to patients with stage III disease (n=32), the same subregion achieved an even higher CI of 0.75 (hazard ratio 3.93, log-rank P=.002) for predicting OS, and a CI of 0.76 (hazard ratio 4.84, log-rank P=.002) for predicting OFP. In comparison, conventional imaging markers, including tumor volume, maximum standardized uptake value, and metabolic tumor volume using threshold of 50% standardized uptake value maximum, were not predictive of OS or OFP, with CI mostly below 0.60 (log-rank P>.05).

conclusionWe propose a robust intratumor partitioning method to identify clinically relevant, high-risk subregions in lung cancer. We envision that this approach will be applicable to identifying useful imaging biomarkers in many cancer types.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18AgedAged, 80 and overCaliforniaFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrevalencePrognosisRadiopharmaceuticalsRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedReproducibility of ResultsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID27212196
PMCPMC4969127
OpenAlexW2307308593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.