ArticleEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2017
Molecular and physiological responses to titanium dioxide and cerium oxide nanoparticles in Arabidopsis.
Article in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- Common Gene Expression Patterns in Environmental Model Organisms Exposed to Engineered Nanomaterials: A Meta-Analysis.Environmental science & technology · 2020Pooled it
- Effect of nanoparticles on the growth of okra cultivated in soil affected by rocky desertification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Role of nanobionics to improve the photosynthetic productivity in plants and algae: an emerging approach.3 Biotech · 2025Review
- Analysis of bioglass/cerium dioxide nanocoating and its antibacterial properties for the restoration of hard tissue around oral titanium implants.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Nanoparticles and root traits: mineral nutrition, stress tolerance and interaction with rhizosphere microbiota.Planta · 2024Review
- Recent Advances in Metal-Based Nanoparticle-Mediated Biological Effects inMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Titanium nanoparticles activate a transcriptional response in Arabidopsis that enhances tolerance to low phosphate, osmotic stress and pathogen infection.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Engineered Nanomaterials in Soil: Their Impact on Soil Microbiome and Plant Health.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Growth-Promoting Gold Nanoparticles Decrease Stress Responses in Arabidopsis Seedlings.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Nanostructured Ceria: Biomolecular Templates and (Bio)applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Salt Stress Mitigation via the Foliar Application of Chitosan-Functionalized Selenium and Anatase Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles in Stevia (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Nanoimpact in Plants: Lessons from the Transcriptome.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Comparative Analysis of Proteins Regulated during Cadmium Sulfide Quantum Dots Response inNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Metabolomic analyses of the bio-corona formed on TiOJournal of nanobiotechnology · 2020Article
- Wheat exposure to cerium oxide nanoparticles over three generations reveals transmissible changes in nutrition, biochemical pools, and response to soil N.Journal of hazardous materials · 2020Article
- Douglas-Fir ( Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) Transcriptome Profile Changes Induced by Diesel Emissions Generated with CeOEnvironmental science & technology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Changes in tissue transcriptomes and productivity of Arabidopsis thaliana were investigated during exposure of plants to 2 widely used engineered metal oxide nanoparticles, titanium dioxide (nano-titania) and cerium dioxide (nano-ceria). Microarray analyses confirmed that exposure to either nanoparticle altered the transcriptomes of rosette leaves and roots, with comparatively larger numbers of differentially expressed genes found under nano-titania exposure. Nano-titania induced more differentially expressed genes in rosette leaves, whereas roots had more differentially expressed genes under nano-ceria exposure. MapMan analyses indicated that although nano-titania up-regulated overall metabolism in both tissues, metabolic processes under nano-ceria remained mostly unchanged. Gene enrichment analysis indicated that both nanoparticles mainly enriched ontology groups such as responses to stress (abiotic and biotic), and defense responses (pathogens), and responses to endogenous stimuli (hormones). Nano-titania specifically induced genes associated with photosynthesis, whereas nano-ceria induced expression of genes related to activating transcription factors, most notably those belonging to the ethylene responsive element binding protein family. Interestingly, there were also increased numbers of rosette leaves and plant biomass under nano-ceria exposure, but not under nano-titania. Other transcriptomic responses did not clearly relate to responses observed at the organism level, possibly because of functional and genomic redundancy in Arabidopsis, which may mask expression of morphological changes, despite discernable responses at the transcriptome level. In addition, transcriptomic changes often relate to transgenerational phenotypic development, and hence it may be productive to direct further experimental work to integrate high-throughput genomic results with longer term changes in subsequent generations. Environ Toxicol Chem 2017;36:71-82. Published 2016 Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of SETAC. This article is a US government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.